2008
DOI: 10.1080/00927870801941473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreducible Divisor Graphs in Commutative Rings with Zero Divisors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This topic has been further studied in [7] and generalized to non-domains in [2]. Given an atomic domain D and a nonzero nonunit x ∈ D, the irreducible divisor graph of x in D, denoted G x has as vertices one representative from each associate class of irreducible divisors of x.…”
Section: Motivation and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic has been further studied in [7] and generalized to non-domains in [2]. Given an atomic domain D and a nonzero nonunit x ∈ D, the irreducible divisor graph of x in D, denoted G x has as vertices one representative from each associate class of irreducible divisors of x.…”
Section: Motivation and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this again yields two distinct -atomic factorizations of y a 1 , y a 1 = b 1 c 1 · · · c m = a 2 · · · a n again contradicting the minimality of n. Hence, must be empty as desired, completing the proof. (6) For all x ∈ D # , degl a < for all a ∈ V G x ; (7) For all x ∈ D # , deg a < for all a ∈ V G x .…”
Section: The -Irreducible Divisor Graph and -Finite Factorization Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of looking exclusively at divisors of zero in a ring, they restrict to a domain D and choose any nonzero, non unit x ∈ D and study the relationships between the irreducible divisors of x. In [6,7], Axtell, Baeth, and Stickles present several nice results about factorization properties of domains based on their associated irreducible divisor graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…p is a prime in Z by [11,Lemma 2.3]. However, (1, p) is never an essential divisor in any U-factorization of (1, 0) (or τ d -U-factorization or τ d -U-factorization).…”
Section: Irreducible Divisor Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%