2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrational Delay Revisited: Examining Five Procrastination Scales in a Global Sample

Abstract: Scales attempting to measure procrastination focus on different facets of the phenomenon, yet they share a common understanding of procrastination as an unnecessary, unwanted, and disadvantageous delay. The present paper examines in a global sample (N = 4,169) five different procrastination scales – Decisional Procrastination Scale (DPS), Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS), Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS), Adult Inventory of Procrastination Scale (AIP), and General Procrastination Scale (GPS), focusing on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
83
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
15
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, procrastination was considered as both a general tendency and as specific to individuals, taking into account those instruments that better integrate the multi-faceted nature of procrastination (according to the analysis provided by Díaz-Morales et al, 2006). Thus, we used the General Procrastination Scale (GP; Lay, 1986), the Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire (DP; Mann, 1982, Unpublished), the Adult Inventory of Procrastination (AIP; McCown and Johnson, 1989) and the Pure Procrastination Scale (PP; Steel, 2010), consisting of 12 items stemming from the three previous scales, which has shown its potential – in comparison to the rest of procrastination measures – elsewhere (e.g., Steel, 2010; Svartdal and Steel, 2017). The Spanish translation by Díaz-Morales et al (2006) was used in all cases and reliability of all these scales was acceptable (α GP = 0.754; α DP = 0.807; α AIP = 0.853; α PP = 0.832).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, procrastination was considered as both a general tendency and as specific to individuals, taking into account those instruments that better integrate the multi-faceted nature of procrastination (according to the analysis provided by Díaz-Morales et al, 2006). Thus, we used the General Procrastination Scale (GP; Lay, 1986), the Decisional Procrastination Questionnaire (DP; Mann, 1982, Unpublished), the Adult Inventory of Procrastination (AIP; McCown and Johnson, 1989) and the Pure Procrastination Scale (PP; Steel, 2010), consisting of 12 items stemming from the three previous scales, which has shown its potential – in comparison to the rest of procrastination measures – elsewhere (e.g., Steel, 2010; Svartdal and Steel, 2017). The Spanish translation by Díaz-Morales et al (2006) was used in all cases and reliability of all these scales was acceptable (α GP = 0.754; α DP = 0.807; α AIP = 0.853; α PP = 0.832).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, procrastination has proven to be a construct with multiple facets (Svartdal and Steel, 2017), including decisional procrastination, linked with subpar planning and decision making (Mann, 1982;Mann et al, 1997); general procrastination, centered on behavioral implemental deLay (1986); and a lateness factor, linked with failing to meet deadlines (McCown and Johnson, 1989). Furthermore, cyclical models of self-regulation (Zimmerman, 1998) suggest that dysregulations such as poor decision-making skills or low perseverance may both lead to procrastination, low achievement and, thus, to frustration and lower wellbeing.…”
Section: Procrastination: Volitional Self-regulation Failure Impairs mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-regulation and procrastination are closely linked constructs (Steel and Klingsieck, 2016;Steel et al, 2018). Self-regulation includes a dimension of perseverance, as well as self-motivational and strategic aspects (Dewitte and Lens, 2000;Garzón-Umerenkova et al, 2017), whereas procrastination is a self-regulation failure (Steel, 2010), which includes a distinct emphasis on implemental or decisional delays, prompting the failure to meet deadlines, known as lateness factor (Svartdal and Steel, 2017).…”
Section: Full Structural Equation Model For Self-regulation and Pure mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations