2013
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiation to the Young Mouse Brain Caused Long-Term, Progressive Depletion of Neurogenesis but did not Disrupt the Neurovascular Niche

Abstract: We investigated the effects of ionizing radiation on microvessel structure and complexity in the hippocampus. We also assessed neurogenesis and the neurovascular niche. Postnatal day 14 male C57BL/6 mice received a single dose of 8 Gy to the whole brain and were killed 6 hours, 1 week, 7 weeks, or 1 year later. Irradiation decreased the total number of microvessels and branching points from 1 week onwards and decreased the total microvessel area 1 and 7 weeks after irradiation. After an initial increase in vas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
38
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(71 reference statements)
11
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…LPS alone did not reduce cytogenesis in the DG or the GCL, rather the opposite. IR, on the other hand, greatly reduced cytogenesis in the DG and the GCL, as also demonstrated earlier [10,12,22,29,30], and IR itself induces oxidative stress and an inflammatory reaction [10,26]. Apparently, in this study LPS pretreatment sensitized the DG to a subsequent IR insult, but it is known that neurogenesis can be both up- and downregulated in response to injurious stimuli [31], and whether an injurious stimulus will induce sensitization (as in the current study) or the opposite (a protective, preconditioning effect) depends on both dose and timing, as described below.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LPS alone did not reduce cytogenesis in the DG or the GCL, rather the opposite. IR, on the other hand, greatly reduced cytogenesis in the DG and the GCL, as also demonstrated earlier [10,12,22,29,30], and IR itself induces oxidative stress and an inflammatory reaction [10,26]. Apparently, in this study LPS pretreatment sensitized the DG to a subsequent IR insult, but it is known that neurogenesis can be both up- and downregulated in response to injurious stimuli [31], and whether an injurious stimulus will induce sensitization (as in the current study) or the opposite (a protective, preconditioning effect) depends on both dose and timing, as described below.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is well known that IR retards or even stops growth of the DG if performed before the DG has reached its full size [12,22,28,29]. The group pretreated with LPS displayed a more pronounced lack of growth than the vehicle-treated group after IR (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapidly proliferating neuronal progenitors are a sensitive target of irradiation, and especially their integration in the DG is progressively impaired following this treatment [5,37,38]. According to recent findings, lithium positively regulates the neurogenic process and facilitates the reintegration of newly generated neurons after ablation of neurogenesis [26,27,28,29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After IR of the growing brain, the loss of endogenous NSPCs leads to a long-lasting, progressive reduction of neurogenesis (8), so a strategy aiming to replenish both undifferentiated NSPCs and differentiated granule neurons would appear ideal. Transplanted BNSPCs have the capacity to produce neural cells in different CNS disease models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their high proliferative capacity, these cells are susceptible to IR damage (16,35,42). IR-induced depletion of neural stem/progenitor cells appears to be long lasting, even after a single moderate dose of radiation (8,24). Interventions after IR have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%