2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.187202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiation-Induced Magnetism in Graphite: A Density Functional Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

42
554
6
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 653 publications
(611 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
42
554
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of density functional theory (DFT) calculations, it is well-known that on planar graphite, a relaxed monovacancy configuration has two of the dangling bonds partially reconstructing and the third bond emerging out of the plane. [56][57][58] Whereas non-spin-polarized DFT calculations predict this protrusion to be larger, 56,57 DFT calculations taking into account spin polarization predict an out-of-plane protrusion of 0.18 Å. 58 As DFT or advanced tight binding calculations are required to reproduce the monovacancy relaxation accurately, we resorted to exporting a DFT relaxed vacancy configuration to the Gromacs simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of density functional theory (DFT) calculations, it is well-known that on planar graphite, a relaxed monovacancy configuration has two of the dangling bonds partially reconstructing and the third bond emerging out of the plane. [56][57][58] Whereas non-spin-polarized DFT calculations predict this protrusion to be larger, 56,57 DFT calculations taking into account spin polarization predict an out-of-plane protrusion of 0.18 Å. 58 As DFT or advanced tight binding calculations are required to reproduce the monovacancy relaxation accurately, we resorted to exporting a DFT relaxed vacancy configuration to the Gromacs simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[56][57][58] Whereas non-spin-polarized DFT calculations predict this protrusion to be larger, 56,57 DFT calculations taking into account spin polarization predict an out-of-plane protrusion of 0.18 Å. 58 As DFT or advanced tight binding calculations are required to reproduce the monovacancy relaxation accurately, we resorted to exporting a DFT relaxed vacancy configuration to the Gromacs simulations. The DFT-based relaxation was performed in a unit cell of 127 atoms using the plane wave basis Vienna ab initio simulation pack (VASP) code 59,60 and implementing the spin-polarized DFT with the generalized gradient approximation; for more details on relaxation process, see ref 58.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their focus is on the possible occurrence of midgap states without introducing defects in the antidot lattice, as was the case in the original proposal by Pedersen et al 9 Many studies on magnetization have been reported for various graphene structures. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The origin of the magnetism can be understood based on the theory by Lieb, 20 and the subsequent related work by Inui et al 28 on the properties of the bipartite lattice. Single vacancies and their spin properties have been studied by, e.g., Lehtinen et al 21 and Palacios et al; 22 the latter paper also investigates voids in both graphene and graphene ribbons in detail using a mean-field Hubbard-model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the origin of magnetic ordering in such systems is yet to be fully understood, it has been suggested that spin polarization may arise from local structural defects, 33,36,41,53 sterically protected carbon radicals 34 and chemical impurities. 30,40,43 A unique mechanism for spin ordering in graphene based systems is related to the appearance of edge states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%