2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiated, colour-temperature-corrected accretion discs in ultraluminous X-ray sources

Abstract: Although attempts have been made to constrain the stellar types of optical counterparts to ULXs, the detection of optical variability instead suggests that they may be dominated by reprocessed emission from X-rays which irradiate the outer accretion disc. Here, we report results from a combined X-ray and optical spectral study of a sample of ULXs, which were selected for having broadened disc-like X-ray spectra, and known optical counterparts. We simultaneously fit optical and X-ray data from ULXs with a new s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In ULXs, of course, the scenario is complex as the bulk of the UV (and possibly the optical) emission may come from the outer disc itself but some contamination can be expected from the companion star (e.g., Grisé et al 2012;Ambrosi & Zampieri 2018). Sutton et al (2014) have shown that most objects at ∼ 10 39 erg/s exhibit disc reprocessing fractions similar to sub-Eddington objects, but at higher luminosities X-ray reprocessing seems to increase, possibly due to scattering of wind X-rays back to the outer disc.…”
Section: Ngc 1313 Ulx and Optical/uv Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ULXs, of course, the scenario is complex as the bulk of the UV (and possibly the optical) emission may come from the outer disc itself but some contamination can be expected from the companion star (e.g., Grisé et al 2012;Ambrosi & Zampieri 2018). Sutton et al (2014) have shown that most objects at ∼ 10 39 erg/s exhibit disc reprocessing fractions similar to sub-Eddington objects, but at higher luminosities X-ray reprocessing seems to increase, possibly due to scattering of wind X-rays back to the outer disc.…”
Section: Ngc 1313 Ulx and Optical/uv Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of GRS 1915+105, the estimated disk size is ∼10 12 cm and the mass in the disk is ∼10 28 g, which suffices to keep the X-ray source at or above 10 39 erg s −1 for decades (Done et al 2004). As for the other requirement (i.e., a strong irradiation of the outer disk), broadband spectral modelling of observational data suggests (Sutton et al 2014) reprocessing fractions ∼10 −3 for sub-Eddington stellar-mass X-ray binaries and some ULXs, and ∼10 −2 for other ULXs, specifically those with soft X-ray spectra. The reason for the enhanced irradiation factor in some ULXs may be that their strong disk wind intercepts and scatters a fraction of photons emitted in the polar funnel and re-directs them onto the outer disk (Sutton et al 2014).…”
Section: Transient Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the other requirement (i.e., a strong irradiation of the outer disk), broadband spectral modelling of observational data suggests (Sutton et al 2014) reprocessing fractions ∼10 −3 for sub-Eddington stellar-mass X-ray binaries and some ULXs, and ∼10 −2 for other ULXs, specifically those with soft X-ray spectra. The reason for the enhanced irradiation factor in some ULXs may be that their strong disk wind intercepts and scatters a fraction of photons emitted in the polar funnel and re-directs them onto the outer disk (Sutton et al 2014). This is not the only viable explanation for transient behaviour in ULXs.…”
Section: Transient Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical values of 2%-4% have been found for previous fits of ULX X-ray/optical data sets with the DISKIR model (Berghea & Dudik 2012;Grisé et al 2012;Tao et al 2012). Sutton et al (2014) used an improved model for irratiated disks (one that accounts for the color-temperature correction) to fit a sample of ULXs with disk-like spectra. In this study, Sutton et al (2014) compared the new DISKIR model results with a more traditional DISKIR model fit.…”
Section: Spectral Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%