1995
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.1995.0430509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron Substitution in Soil and Synthetic Anatase

Abstract: Abstract--Iron nI for Ti TM substitution in the structure of pedogenic and synthetic anatase of up to Fe/ (Ti+Fe) 0.1 mol/mol was indicated by an increase in unit cell size as measured by XRD line shifts. MiSssbauer-and electron paramagnetic resonance spectra at both, 298 K and 4.2 K supported this by the presence of signals typical for octahedrally coordinated Fe I11 in a diamagnetic matrix. Charge compensation was achieved by structural OH, as indicated by FTIR bands at 3360 and 960 cm -~, which were absent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iron was found to replace up to 10 mole % of the titanium in the anatase structure, which resulted in a positive correlation between the extent of iron substitution and the anatase unit cell a parameter. When 10 mole % of the titanium was replaced by iron, the anatase unit cell dimensions increased by 0.7 % (Schwertmann et al, 1995). This is consistent with the shift in anatase peaks observed in these leached residues.…”
Section: Mineralogical Transformations During Leachingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iron was found to replace up to 10 mole % of the titanium in the anatase structure, which resulted in a positive correlation between the extent of iron substitution and the anatase unit cell a parameter. When 10 mole % of the titanium was replaced by iron, the anatase unit cell dimensions increased by 0.7 % (Schwertmann et al, 1995). This is consistent with the shift in anatase peaks observed in these leached residues.…”
Section: Mineralogical Transformations During Leachingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These differences correspond to the dimensions of the unit cell being 0.7% larger than theoretical, consistent with iron substituted anatase (Schwertmann et al, 1995). A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The peak shifts and increased peak width can potentially be explained by variable degrees of crystallinity and by solid solution of Fe 3+ in the anatase structure. Although most natural anatase samples previously analyzed include only 1–3 wt% Fe 2 O 3 [ Liu and Mernagh , 1992], synthetic anatases have been precipitated containing up to Fe/(Ti+Fe) 0.1 mol/mol [ Schwertmann et al , 1995]. Substitution of other metals for titanium in natural rutiles has been documented to shift Raman peak positions [ Smith and Perseil , 1996].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gration of Ti, it remains unclear if the Ti-bearing phases observed in this study are authigenic or allogenic constituents. Figure 4 shows a best-fit line through the observed a unit-cell lengths as a function of Fe substitution for four samples of natural anatase from Schwertmann et al (1995) to estimate Fe content for the anatase samples studied here. The resulting values of 0.020-0.045 tool mol ~ in the anatase is relatively small and Fe content appears lower than the soil-derived Fe-bearing anatase (Schwertmann et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows a best-fit line through the observed a unit-cell lengths as a function of Fe substitution for four samples of natural anatase from Schwertmann et al (1995) to estimate Fe content for the anatase samples studied here. The resulting values of 0.020-0.045 tool mol ~ in the anatase is relatively small and Fe content appears lower than the soil-derived Fe-bearing anatase (Schwertmann et al, 1995). With the small size of the anatase (--0.1 Ixm), grains may be transported long distances and deposited without evidence of physical abrasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%