2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron salts dosage for sulfide control in sewers induces chemical phosphorus removal during wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, due to the possible occurrence of anoxic zones, being formed by clumps of worms, the microbial reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ might have had occurred. However, this is not very likely as this would result in ferrous precipitation with soluble phosphate [82,83]. These precipitates would be included in the total iron concentration, which would therefore not change.…”
Section: Total and Dissolved Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, due to the possible occurrence of anoxic zones, being formed by clumps of worms, the microbial reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ might have had occurred. However, this is not very likely as this would result in ferrous precipitation with soluble phosphate [82,83]. These precipitates would be included in the total iron concentration, which would therefore not change.…”
Section: Total and Dissolved Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those include the addition to the sewer-liquid-phase of nitrate (Jiang et al, 2009;Mohanakrishnan et al, 2009a,b;Zhang et al, 2008), nitrite (Jiang et al, 2011a(Jiang et al, , 2010Mohanakrishnan et al, 2008), free nitrous acid (Jiang et al, 2011b), iron salts (Firer et al, 2008;Gutierrez et al, 2010a), oxygen (Boon, 1995;Gutierrez et al, 2008), magnesium hydroxide (Gutierrez et al, 2009) or sodium hydroxide (Gutierrez et al, 2014). Although primarily designed to control sulfide, these chemical-dosing practices may also induce inhibitory effects on methanogens in sewers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, only a vessel for the storage of the salt solution and a pump are required. However, this technique presents several drawbacks, such as accumulation of FeS in the digester, increased amount of iron in the treated sludge, possible re-oxidation of FeS if aerobic conditions are reached, and high cost due to the price of the reactant and the existence of parallel reactions (Devai and Delaune, 2002;Gutierrez et al, 2010;Speece, 2008). The application of other physicochemical methods in industrial sludge digesters is limited due to the scale (for instance, iron-sponges are only suitable for small/medium productions) or the high chemical consumption and the consequent operating cost (as in the case of scrubbing) (Abatzoglou and Boivin, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%