1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-2927(98)00089-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron reduction in the sediments of a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
79
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…adequately represents the overall amount of Fe reduced, with >99% becoming immobilized on sediments [Tuccillo et al, 1999;Amos et al, 2012;Ng et al, 2014]. Mismatches occur mostly due to fine spatial scale mineral variability not captured by the model, as evidenced by patchy Fe(II) observed among core segments over 2006.…”
Section: 1002/2015wr016964mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…adequately represents the overall amount of Fe reduced, with >99% becoming immobilized on sediments [Tuccillo et al, 1999;Amos et al, 2012;Ng et al, 2014]. Mismatches occur mostly due to fine spatial scale mineral variability not captured by the model, as evidenced by patchy Fe(II) observed among core segments over 2006.…”
Section: 1002/2015wr016964mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mineral Fe concentrations are based on a 0.5 M HCl extraction method described by Tuccillo et al [1999]. Initial Fe(OH) 3 concentration of 0.0393 mol/L v (L v is bulk or total aquifer volume in liters) was determined from average background samples measurements of Fe(III) [Tuccillo et al, 1999] and assuming a bulk density of 1650 g/L v .…”
Section: 1002/2015wr016964mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations