2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3en00029j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron oxide nanoparticles induce Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth, induce biofilm formation, and inhibit antimicrobial peptide function

Abstract: Given the increased use of iron-containing nanoparticles in a number of applications, it is important to understand any effects that iron-containing nanoparticles can have on the environment and human health. Since iron concentrations are extremely low in body fluids, there is potential that iron-containing nanoparticles may influence the ability of bacteria to scavenge iron for growth, affect virulence and inhibit antimicrobial peptide (AMP) function. In this study, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA01) and AMPs were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous report showed that the biofilm mass formed in the presence of TiO 2 NPs appeared to increase in LM2 cultures at all nanoparticles doses utilized in a dose-dependent manner during 24 h incubations with significant values for 80, 8, and 0.8 mg/mL (Ammendolia et al, 2014). It has been shown that the presence of iron, especially FeCl 3 , enhances biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa (Patriquin et al, 2008;Borcherding et al, 2014). Our previous study also reported that EPS production increased with increasing Cr(VI) concentration in the growth medium (Harish et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A previous report showed that the biofilm mass formed in the presence of TiO 2 NPs appeared to increase in LM2 cultures at all nanoparticles doses utilized in a dose-dependent manner during 24 h incubations with significant values for 80, 8, and 0.8 mg/mL (Ammendolia et al, 2014). It has been shown that the presence of iron, especially FeCl 3 , enhances biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa (Patriquin et al, 2008;Borcherding et al, 2014). Our previous study also reported that EPS production increased with increasing Cr(VI) concentration in the growth medium (Harish et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…the complexity of the interfacial region between the nanoparticle surface and the aqueous phase surrounding it. 24,25 These studies start with a thin film of hydrated nanoparticles placed on to an ATR crystal. 5 Often these media formulations are prepared to simulate and/or be compatible with different types of biological and environmental systems and consist of a variety of inorganic and organic ligands that include, but are not limited to chlorides, phosphates, carbonates, organic acids, natural organic matter (NOMs), steroids, amino acids, proteins and lipids.…”
Section: Surface Transformations Of Nanomaterials In Different Biologmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In contrast, it has been reported that iron-containing nanoparticles may influence the ability of bacteria to absorb iron for growth, increase virulence, and inhibit AMP function. 18 Here, we present the intrinsic antifungal activity of the citric acid-coated MnFe 2 O 4 -NPs and the improvement of their antifungal activity when these nanoparticles were conjugated with a 12 aa peptide named Cm-p5. 19 This peptide is derived from Cm-p1, which is an MS-MS sequence found in a tryptic chromatographic fraction from the whole animal extract (Cenchritis muricatus [Gastropoda: Littorinidae], Linnaeus, 1758), which was positive for antimicrobial activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55][56][57][58] Indeed, Borcherding et al reported that iron-containing nanoparticles affect the activity of soluble AMPs, probably influenced by the ability of bacteria to scavenge iron for growth from nanoparticles and the adsorption of peptides onto nanoparticle surfaces. 18 It is obvious that AMPs with different physicochemical properties can be affected differently by immobilization reactions. 59 In this sense, Cm-p5 is not an amphipathic peptide, and its antifungal activity does not depend on its amino-terminal group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%