2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron oxide/carbon nanotubes/chitosan magnetic composite film for chromium species removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the removal of Cr(VI) is favoured at a lower pH because of the electrostatic attraction between the protonated surface and negatively charged dichromate ions. [ 27 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the removal of Cr(VI) is favoured at a lower pH because of the electrostatic attraction between the protonated surface and negatively charged dichromate ions. [ 27 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the removal of Cr(VI) is favoured at a lower pH due to the electrostatic attraction between the protonated surface and negatively charged dichromate ions. [ 26 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been demonstrated to be efficient for Cr(VI) removal, such as: ion exchange [5,6], electrochemical treatment [7][8][9], chemical precipitation [10], coagulation [11], chemical reduction [12,13], and adsorption [3,[14][15][16][17]. Some biological treatments [18,19] (phytoremediation [20]) are also applied to remove chromium (VI) from wastewater and groundwater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%