2006
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00489.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron Imports. V. Transport of iron through the intestinal epithelium

Abstract: Iron absorption across the brush-border membrane requires divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), whereas ferroportin (FPN) and hephaestin are required for exit across the basolateral membrane. However, how iron passes across the enterocyte is poorly understood. Both chaperones and transcytosis have been postulated to account for intracellular iron transport. With iron feeding, DMT1 undergoes endocytosis and FPN translocates from the apical cytosol to the basolateral membrane. The fluorescent metallosensor calcei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This mucosal block describes the ability of an initial dose of ingested iron to block iron absorption of a second dose given 2-4 h later. The exact mechanism of this mucosal block is unknown, but in vitro and animal studies suggest the involvement of inhibition of enterocyte import of ingested iron by the ferrous iron transporter divalent metal transporter 1 at the brush border secondary to an increase in intracellular iron (22 ) or a reduction in function of divalent metal transporter 1 and/or the function of the basolateral iron exporter ferroportin secondary to an increase in circulating hepcidin (23)(24)(25)(26). Importantly, the latter mechanism is supported by recent human studies showing an inverse relation between intestinal iron uptake and circulating hepcidin concentrations (9,16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mucosal block describes the ability of an initial dose of ingested iron to block iron absorption of a second dose given 2-4 h later. The exact mechanism of this mucosal block is unknown, but in vitro and animal studies suggest the involvement of inhibition of enterocyte import of ingested iron by the ferrous iron transporter divalent metal transporter 1 at the brush border secondary to an increase in intracellular iron (22 ) or a reduction in function of divalent metal transporter 1 and/or the function of the basolateral iron exporter ferroportin secondary to an increase in circulating hepcidin (23)(24)(25)(26). Importantly, the latter mechanism is supported by recent human studies showing an inverse relation between intestinal iron uptake and circulating hepcidin concentrations (9,16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcytosis is definitely the stage about which the least is known. Although there is evidence that DMT1 moves with the iron [32], Núñez' group [37] recently reminded us that such data can also account for a loss of iron uptake after an iron challenge, traditionally called the mucosal block [54]. Earlier, there were similar observations in Caco2 cells supporting this interpretation [46].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is scant but convincing evidence that FPN (26,44) and DMT1 (6) are located in both the apical and basolateral domains. In iron-starved rats and Caco-2 cells, DMT1 shows a marked brush border distribution, but iron feeding promotes a fast (10 -400 min) internalization of DMT1 into the apical cytoplasm (28,29). This redistribution was interpreted as evidence of a process in which vesicles containing DMT1-iron could fuse with and pass the iron to vesicles containing apo-transferrin (28,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In iron-starved rats and Caco-2 cells, DMT1 shows a marked brush border distribution, but iron feeding promotes a fast (10 -400 min) internalization of DMT1 into the apical cytoplasm (28,29). This redistribution was interpreted as evidence of a process in which vesicles containing DMT1-iron could fuse with and pass the iron to vesicles containing apo-transferrin (28,29). Nevertheless, the possibility of a regulatory mechanism that involves the movement of transporters in response to iron was left open.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%