1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02149743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron deficiency in pea plants effect on catalase, peroxidase, chlorophyll and proteins of leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lincoln) were grown in the greenhouse in aerated full nutrient solutions under optimum conditions as described previously (9). The Mn SOD was purified to homogeneity from pea leaves by the procedure of Sevilla et al (40).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lincoln) were grown in the greenhouse in aerated full nutrient solutions under optimum conditions as described previously (9). The Mn SOD was purified to homogeneity from pea leaves by the procedure of Sevilla et al (40).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tolerance differences between scion/rootstock combinations may be related to differences in ROS production and/or antioxidant system e ciency. The enzymatic antioxidant system response differs according to plant species and the de cient minerals [56][57][58][59][60] . Enzymatic antioxidant systems in common clementine leaves differed depending on the rootstock genotypes ( Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Rootstock Ploidy Level On Anatomical Properties Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are limited to the chloroplasts, affecting even their "ultrastructure" (Pushnik and Miller, 1982), while other cell organdíes such as mitochondria and peroxisomes seem unaffected (Platt-Aloia et al, 1982). Iron deficiency has been investigated in different plant materials such as maize (Stocking, 1975 andAlmela et al, 1983), pea (Del Rio et al, 1978 andAbadia et al, 1989), barley (Pushnik and Miller, 1982), sugar beet (Terry, 1980 andPlatt-Aloia et al, 1983) apricot and pear , and citrus (Alcaraz et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%