2004
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2004.tb10605.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron coagulation and direct microfiltration to remove arsenic from groundwater

Abstract: Arsenic (As) removal using ferric hydroxide coagulation followed by direct microfiltration without flocculation was investigated for an application in Albuquerque, N.M. Typically, the influent drinking water (unchlorinated) was contacted with ferric hydroxide for ≤20 s in a rapid mixer and passed through a membrane microfiltration unit with a nominal pore size of 0.2 μm. Variables investigated included pH, iron (Fe) dose, mixing time and energy, filtrate flux, and backwash interval. The pH and ferric dose were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early bench, pilot, and demonstration scale studies have shown that As(V) can be efficiently removed during coagulation with ferric chloride and alum even when present at low or high concentration in influent waters [8,9]. Aluminum (Al) based salts, e.g., polyaluminum chloride (PACl), aluminum chloride (AlCl 3 ), and alum (traditional Al coagulants), are most commonly used in water treatment plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early bench, pilot, and demonstration scale studies have shown that As(V) can be efficiently removed during coagulation with ferric chloride and alum even when present at low or high concentration in influent waters [8,9]. Aluminum (Al) based salts, e.g., polyaluminum chloride (PACl), aluminum chloride (AlCl 3 ), and alum (traditional Al coagulants), are most commonly used in water treatment plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its removal was thus not favored when pH increased. Indeed, the pH increase led to the decrease of numbers of positively charged active sites on hydroxide ferric surfaces and to the increase in numbers of OH -ions competitive with arsenic for adsorption on hydroxide ferric surface [40]. This experiment thus confirmed sorption as the predominant As(V) removal mechanism.…”
Section: Coagulant Dose Influencementioning
confidence: 53%
“…The influence of coagulant dose on As(III) and As(V) removal was studied by using FeCl 3 as coagulant [16,39,40] at concentrations between 25 and 150 mg L À1 (9.2 6 [Fe 3+ ] (mg L À1 ) 6 55.0 or 165 6 [Fe 3+ ] (lmol L À1 ) 6 985). pH was fixed at different values (with NaOH 1 mol L À1 ), 6.0 ± 0.2, 6.9 ± 0.3, and 7.7 ± 0.1, to study its influence on arsenic removal under these specific coagulant conditions.…”
Section: Coagulation/flocculation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfiltration after precipitation/coprecipitation with Fe(III) salts is one of the most effective and popular strategies for removing As(V) from water. Specifically, a combination of iron (oxy)(hydr)oxide coprecipitation using Fe(III) chloride followed by microfiltration can reduce As(V) concentrations in water from 40 to less than 2 μg L −1 (Shih, 2005, 93-94, Table 7.1;Ghurye, Clifford and Tripp, 2004).…”
Section: Separation Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%