2023
DOI: 10.1111/afe.12553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irish faba beans (Fabales: Fabaceae) depend on wild bumblebee pollination for marketable yields

Abstract: Quantifying the contributions of insect pollinators to crops provides insight into how pollination services should be managed and protected into the future. Faba bean, Vicia faba var minor (Linneaus), is a widely grown crop globally that can benefit from pollinator visitation, but only from species that are morphologically compatible with the plant's long‐corollae flowers. Here, we rank insect pollinators in terms of their potential importance to faba bean pollination and quantify the economic value of pollina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the foraging visits we observed may not have represented efficient pollination. Longtongued bees (particularly B. hortorum which was the most frequently observed long-tongued bumblebee in our study) have been shown to be more efficient field bean pollinators (Burns & Stanley 2023). The number of long-tongued bees seen was much lower than other functional groups.…”
Section: Field Bean Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the foraging visits we observed may not have represented efficient pollination. Longtongued bees (particularly B. hortorum which was the most frequently observed long-tongued bumblebee in our study) have been shown to be more efficient field bean pollinators (Burns & Stanley 2023). The number of long-tongued bees seen was much lower than other functional groups.…”
Section: Field Bean Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The long-tongued bees were observed in much smaller numbers and very rarely robbed < 20% of visits (as per. Burns & Stanley, (2023); Marzinzig et al, (2018)). Their behaviour could not be analysed separately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%