2021
DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iris Murdoch, privacy, and the limits of moral testimony

Abstract: Recent discussions of moral testimony have focused on the acceptability of forming beliefs on the basis of moral testimony, but there has been little acknowledgement of the limits to testimony's capacity to convey moral knowledge. In this paper I outline one such limit, drawing on Iris Murdoch's conception of private moral concepts. Such concepts, I suggest, plausibly play an important role in moral thought, and yet moral knowledge expressed in them cannot be testimonially acquired.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18. For more on Murdoch's notion of privacy, see Hopwood (2017), Wiseman (2020) and Mason (2022). hard to see how there could be such differing moral concepts without some such concepts being inaccurate or simply incomplete.…”
Section: Complicating the Picturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…18. For more on Murdoch's notion of privacy, see Hopwood (2017), Wiseman (2020) and Mason (2022). hard to see how there could be such differing moral concepts without some such concepts being inaccurate or simply incomplete.…”
Section: Complicating the Picturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But she did not develop a systematic account of perspective and would have been skeptical that something like perspectives can be shared interpersonally. See Mason (2022). Tiberius is interested in the role of perspective in the prudential realm: adopting a perspective is a matter of structuring one's attention in light of a particular value or commitment one holds.…”
Section: Trying To Make Sense Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%