2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icsipa.2015.7412224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iris code matching using adaptive Hamming distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…we use a statistical method to account eyelashes presented in litirature [12] and 1D Log-Gabor Filter features to uniquely identify iris. We have studied various well known algorithms for iris recognition [29], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37] and compared the results with state-of-the art algorithms. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…we use a statistical method to account eyelashes presented in litirature [12] and 1D Log-Gabor Filter features to uniquely identify iris. We have studied various well known algorithms for iris recognition [29], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37] and compared the results with state-of-the art algorithms. Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soliman et al [36] used a coarse-to-fine algorithm to address the computational cost problem and the integrodifferential operator to get information aboutpupil centers and radii. In [37] Dehkordi et al used Adaptive Hamming Distance to improve the performance of iris code matching stage. The expanding and adjoining behavior of Hamming subsets to the right or left neighboring bits increased the accuracy of Hamming distance computation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot compute distance metrics across observations with different numbers of features, and it Scientific Programming is pointless to do so if the number of features is the same but the actual features are different. Adaptive HD [41] was used in Iris code matching, thereby improving the performance of Iris code matching.…”
Section: Hamming Distance (Hd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the characterization of the iris, the most useful methods are the Gabor wavelet transform applied by Daugman, the Gabor filter [24], the Laplacian pyramid [25], and orientable pyramid transform method [26]. We have studied various well-known algorithms for iris recognition [17,18,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and propose a new method for iris detection based on the fusion of FLDA/PCA. We also employ 1D Log-Gabor filter and used hamming distance for comparison between two iris templates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%