2020
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irinotecan and vandetanib create synergies for treatment of pancreatic cancer patients with concomitant TP53 and KRAS mutations

Abstract: Background: The most frequently mutated gene pairs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) are KRAS and TP53, and our goal is to illustrate the multiomics and molecular dynamics landscapes of KRAS/TP53 mutation and also to obtain prospective novel drugs for KRAS- and TP53-mutated PAAD patients. Moreover, we also made an attempt to discover the probable link amid KRAS and TP53 on the basis of the abovementioned multiomics data. Method: We utilized TCGA & Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia data for the analysis of KR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two switch domains, SW1 and SW2, together with the P-loop shape a binding pocket of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GNEFs) or effectors (Figure B). The literature indicates that mutations of oncogenic K-Ras have a vital effect on the conformational transformation of SW1 and SW2, which further disturbs binding of GNEFs or effectors and tunes the activity of K-Ras. Based on oncogenic roles of K-Ras, different works have been involved in insights into mutation-mediated conformational transformations of K-Ras, , phosphorylation-induced effect on the activity of K-Ras, bindings of K-Ras to membranes, and allosteric drug design toward K-Ras. These studies have provided rational and useful information for the understanding of the roles of K-Ras in anticancer treatment. However, it is still highly essential to deeply decrypt mutation-mediated influences on conformational transformations of SW1 and SW2 for development of anticancer drugs targeting oncogenic K-Ras mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two switch domains, SW1 and SW2, together with the P-loop shape a binding pocket of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GNEFs) or effectors (Figure B). The literature indicates that mutations of oncogenic K-Ras have a vital effect on the conformational transformation of SW1 and SW2, which further disturbs binding of GNEFs or effectors and tunes the activity of K-Ras. Based on oncogenic roles of K-Ras, different works have been involved in insights into mutation-mediated conformational transformations of K-Ras, , phosphorylation-induced effect on the activity of K-Ras, bindings of K-Ras to membranes, and allosteric drug design toward K-Ras. These studies have provided rational and useful information for the understanding of the roles of K-Ras in anticancer treatment. However, it is still highly essential to deeply decrypt mutation-mediated influences on conformational transformations of SW1 and SW2 for development of anticancer drugs targeting oncogenic K-Ras mutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this shortcoming, a great many computation and simulation technologies, such as conventional molecular dynamics (cMD), free energy landscapes (FELs), metadynamics, , essential dynamics (ED) analysis, accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD), , and Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD), etc., are developed to obtain rational dynamics information concerning conformational alterations of proteins. Furthermore, these technologies have been successfully applied to decode mutation-induced conformational changes and activity adjustment of K-Ras and other Ras proteins. , For example, Lu et al performed exchanged nucleotide simulations, and their results unveiled that conformational transformation is more accessible in the GTP-to-GDP exchanges than in the GDP-to-GTP one . Our previous insights into the mutation-mediated effect on conformational changes of the GppNHp-bound H-Ras reveal that mutations G12V, T35S, and Q61K greatly affect the switch transformation of SW1 and SW2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study revealed several cancer driver genes that differed between the high and low m 5 C score groups, including KRAS, FBXW7, and SMAD3. KRAS is the most common cancer driver gene in PAAD ( 71 ). The E3 ligase FBXW7 has also been reported to regulate PAAD cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ferroptosis and apoptosis ( 72 , 73 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its activating mutations occur in approximately 30% of all human cancers, including 90% of pancreatic cancers, 50% of colon cancers and 25% of lung cancers [34]. Besides, KRAS mutant was linked with poor prognosis in patients with PAAD [35]. In particular, most tumors frequently present TP53 [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%