2006
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-036368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRF-4 and c-Rel expression in antiviral-resistant adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the mammalian IRFs, IRF4 is considered playing divers and important roles in the progress of lymphocyte development, via activating the lymphocyte differentiation related genes by individual or cooperation with other factors (Acquaviva et al, 2008; De Silva Eisenbeis et al, 1995;Huber and Lohoff, 2014;Ramos et al, 2007). Besides the transcription function, irf4 expression is also identified as a molecular checkpoint of B cell activation (Mittrucker et al, 1997;Yamagata et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the mammalian IRFs, IRF4 is considered playing divers and important roles in the progress of lymphocyte development, via activating the lymphocyte differentiation related genes by individual or cooperation with other factors (Acquaviva et al, 2008; De Silva Eisenbeis et al, 1995;Huber and Lohoff, 2014;Ramos et al, 2007). Besides the transcription function, irf4 expression is also identified as a molecular checkpoint of B cell activation (Mittrucker et al, 1997;Yamagata et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of a plateau phase in long-term PFS after CR with AZT-IFN confirms this therapy is suppressive, but not curative, which is evidenced by the persistence of minimal residual blood circulating malignant clones in serially analyzed long-term responders during progression-free periods. 18 Overall, these data support AZT-IFN as up-front therapy whenever feasible in patients with aggressive nonbulky nonlymphomatous ATLL; this approach would be particularly beneficial in patients who are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy or allo-HSCT.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a local institutional practice, high-dose AZT (1.5 g or, more recently, 750 mg/m 2 , twice daily) and interferon-alfa-2b (IFN-a; 5-10 million units twice daily) were initiated and administered IV on an inpatient basis as previously reported. 18 In general, patients who responded continued to receive oral AZT 600 mg twice daily and subcutaneous IFN-a 5 million units once or twice daily as outpatients. For patients with prolonged clinical responses, these drugs were eventually tapered down to as low as AZT 300 mg twice daily and subcutaneous IFN-a 3 million units three times weekly as maintenance therapy.…”
Section: Treatment Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45] Among the NF-kB subunits, RelA (p65) has been implicated in DLBCL and multiple myeloma, 10,46,47 whereas c-Rel has been implicated as a driver of IRF4 in activated lymphocytes, in human T-lymphotropic virus-Itransformed cells, and in the human T-lymphotropic virus-I-associated neoplasm adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. [48][49][50] In PTCL, however, our data suggest that the alternative NF-kB pathway (p52 and RelB) [54][55][56] It would be of interest to examine retrospectively whether these responses were associated with IRF4 expression because biomarker-driven patient selection might increase response rates to NF-kB-targeted therapies. Nevertheless, our data should not be interpreted to suggest that the functional effects of NF-kB inhibition in PTCL cells are entirely IRF4 dependent, as the NF-kB complex is a master transcriptional regulator with a myriad of targets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%