1986
DOI: 10.3362/0262-8104.1986.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRC's slow sand filtration project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elimination processes can be attributed to biotic and abiotic factors . Main advantages of the SSF are its simple and economical construction, operation, and maintenance using local materials and skills . It does not require chemicals or energy and needs less land compared to other natural technologies for pathogen removal because of high hydraulic loading rates of up to 9.6 m/d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elimination processes can be attributed to biotic and abiotic factors . Main advantages of the SSF are its simple and economical construction, operation, and maintenance using local materials and skills . It does not require chemicals or energy and needs less land compared to other natural technologies for pathogen removal because of high hydraulic loading rates of up to 9.6 m/d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low flow rates of surface waters during dry seasons will result in high levels of toxic and microbial contamination from upstream human waste, agricultural runoff and industrial processing facilities. As concentrations of faceal coliforms in untreated water supplies vary widely in developing countries (Vsscher et al, 1986), polluted source waters were simulated by maintaining a filter influent concentration of approximately 10 6 E. coli cells per 100 mL.…”
Section: Microbiological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%