2014
DOI: 10.1261/rna.045088.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRBIS: a systematic search for conserved complementarity

Abstract: IRBIS is a computational pipeline for detecting conserved complementary regions in unaligned orthologous sequences. Unlike other methods, it follows the "first-fold-then-align" principle in which all possible combinations of complementary k-mers are searched for simultaneous conservation. The novel trimming procedure reduces the size of the search space and improves the performance to the point where large-scale analyses of intra-and intermolecular RNA-RNA interactions become possible. In this article, I provi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In silico approaches such as comparative genomics and structural prediction are useful for identifying base-pairing interactions (Plocik and Graveley 2013); however, highly complex RNA interactions may be extremely difficult to predict (Cruz and Westhof 2009). The RNA bidirectional structural architectures identified in our study were not detected using recent high-throughput RNA structure sequencing techniques Li et al 2012), nor were they discovered by in silico approaches, although stem II of the Drosophila srp pre-mRNA was predicted Pervouchine 2014). Moreover, most RNA structural studies focus on the role of a local RNA duplex in alternative splicing and other processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In silico approaches such as comparative genomics and structural prediction are useful for identifying base-pairing interactions (Plocik and Graveley 2013); however, highly complex RNA interactions may be extremely difficult to predict (Cruz and Westhof 2009). The RNA bidirectional structural architectures identified in our study were not detected using recent high-throughput RNA structure sequencing techniques Li et al 2012), nor were they discovered by in silico approaches, although stem II of the Drosophila srp pre-mRNA was predicted Pervouchine 2014). Moreover, most RNA structural studies focus on the role of a local RNA duplex in alternative splicing and other processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…from [23] ( Figure S2). The structure responsible for splicing of the intron between exons 9 and 10 in SF1 [33] was in group III (-25.1 kcal/mol); the structure associated with exon 46-52 skipping in DST [34] was in group II (−24.3 kcal/mol); a long-distance intronic interaction that regulates PLP1/DM20 splicing [37] was in group I (−15.8 kcal/mol); the structure that was suggested to regulate mutually exclusive exon choice in DNM1 [38] was in group III (−25.9 kcal/mol). The RNA bridge in ENAH [39] also belongs to group I (−19.4 kcal/mol) and spreads over 1,700 nts, indicating that less stable RNA structures are not less functional or less interesting than the others.…”
Section: Rna Structures Listed Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational identification of long-range RNA structure therefore remains a great challenge in RNA biology.Comparative genomics provides a powerful alternative to de novo RNA folding by detecting signatures of evolutionary covariation [31,32]. In previous reports, we presented a methodology that implemented simultaneous alignment and RNA folding using k-mers [28,33,34]. However, in the vast majority of cases, sequence alignments have insufficient variation to detect covariations [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Andronescu et al [29] developed the PairFold algorithm for secondary structure prediction of minimum free energy. Pervouchine [30], Alkan et al [31] and Kato et al [32] presented different dynamic programming algorithms with different scoring functions for predicting secondary structures, respectively. However, these algorithms cannot deal with circular single-stranded DNA tiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%