“…As Yuval‐Davis (1997) highlighted, the leading studies on nation and nationalism have vastly negated gender‐nation relations by considering them irrelevant. Conversely, those studies that have examined this relationship have argued that women are instrumentalized as valuable tools in national movements to construct a nation in which women are treated as second‐class members (Al‐Ali, 2007; Aslan, 2014; Baron, 2005; Hogan, 2008; Kandiyoti, 1991; Peteet, 2002; Yuval‐Davis, 1997, 2003; Yuval‐Davis & Anthias, 1989). However, in the Kurdish case, as well as in some other similar cases, such as the Zapatistas (Marcos, 2014), a national movement and its discourse operate as a channel for pursuing a gender‐egalitarian agenda with a focus on women's liberation from social modes of oppression.…”