2015
DOI: 10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iranian EFL learners’ preferred oral corrective feedback: High anxious learners vs. low anxious learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results show that students value teachers' CF the most, followed by student peer-feedback, and self-correction was the least favoured. Abedi et al (2015), in a face-to-face study, coincides with Zhang and Rahimi (2014) in that teacher CF is the most favoured. Rollinson (2005) found in face-to-face environments that peer-feedback is less authoritarian and more supportive but students perceive it as less useful.…”
Section: Corrective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Their results show that students value teachers' CF the most, followed by student peer-feedback, and self-correction was the least favoured. Abedi et al (2015), in a face-to-face study, coincides with Zhang and Rahimi (2014) in that teacher CF is the most favoured. Rollinson (2005) found in face-to-face environments that peer-feedback is less authoritarian and more supportive but students perceive it as less useful.…”
Section: Corrective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Also, one should consider that students' L1 can influence the degree of difficulty when learning another language (Zhanming, 2014). The fact that the literature on levels of anxiety in learning a FL show different results may be due to many variables such as the students' L1 and target language (Abedi, Mahadavi, & Hassaskhah, 2015;Baralt & Gurzynski-Weiss 2011;Martínez 2013;Renko 2012;Sheen 2008).…”
Section: Foreign Language Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations