2020
DOI: 10.1057/s41261-020-00126-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(IR) Relevance of goodwill impairment: the case of European banking (2005–2015)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is therefore a clear "bath" effect just before the new accounting standard starts to be applied. The evidence of firms opportunistically managing goodwill impairment is in line with recent evidence by Filip et al (2021), Pallarés-Sanchidrián et al (2021, Xiao &Yang (2021), andGiner (2022), showing a delayed recognition of goodwill impairment (e.g., Albersmann & Quick, 2020) that is only corrected through 9 The value of the Hausman test obtained in the contrast between fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) was 93.61 with a p-value=0.0000. This leads to rejection of the null hypothesis that RE provides consistent estimates.…”
Section: Determinants Of Impairmentsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is therefore a clear "bath" effect just before the new accounting standard starts to be applied. The evidence of firms opportunistically managing goodwill impairment is in line with recent evidence by Filip et al (2021), Pallarés-Sanchidrián et al (2021, Xiao &Yang (2021), andGiner (2022), showing a delayed recognition of goodwill impairment (e.g., Albersmann & Quick, 2020) that is only corrected through 9 The value of the Hausman test obtained in the contrast between fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) was 93.61 with a p-value=0.0000. This leads to rejection of the null hypothesis that RE provides consistent estimates.…”
Section: Determinants Of Impairmentsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Since then, most academic literature has studied the introduction of impairment tests (e.g., André et al, 2015;Cheng et al, 2018;Pallarés-Sanchidrián et al, 2021). However, the debate lingers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%