2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ipsilesional spatial bias after a focal cerebral infarction in the medial agranular cortex: A mouse model of unilateral spatial neglect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, lesion volume might influence the mechanisms of recovery, with predominantly intrahemispheric compensation for small lesions, and recruitment of circuits in the opposite, healthy hemisphere for larger lesions. More relevant to neglect, a mouse model of ipsilesional spatial bias after focal damage to the medial agranular cortex demonstrated that the extent of the postlesional bias, but not that of recovery, correlated with the lesion size [78]. This pattern of results suggests that recovery was based on neural plasticity not within the peri-infarct area, but in distal regions in the same or contralateral hemisphere.…”
Section: Where: Neglect Compensation In the Brain Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, lesion volume might influence the mechanisms of recovery, with predominantly intrahemispheric compensation for small lesions, and recruitment of circuits in the opposite, healthy hemisphere for larger lesions. More relevant to neglect, a mouse model of ipsilesional spatial bias after focal damage to the medial agranular cortex demonstrated that the extent of the postlesional bias, but not that of recovery, correlated with the lesion size [78]. This pattern of results suggests that recovery was based on neural plasticity not within the peri-infarct area, but in distal regions in the same or contralateral hemisphere.…”
Section: Where: Neglect Compensation In the Brain Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used focal photothrombotic infarction in the AGm as a stroke model [13,[17][18][19]. The detailed descriptions can be found in the previous study [13].…”
Section: Photothrombotic Infarction In the Agmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In egocentric hemineglect, the midline is determined from the central axis of the patient's neck, torso, and retina (spectator-oriented), whereas in allocentric hemineglect, the midline is determined from the central axis of the stimulus, regardless of its position in the environment (stimulus-oriented). In the vast majority of patients with the phenomenon of ignoring, egocentric hemineglect is observed [14,17]. In other words, a person with the lesion of the right hemisphere of the brain in egocentric neglect loses the ability to respond to information coming from the left side of the body, and in allocentric -the ability to respond to the left side of each object, regardless of the position of this object to the patient (Fig.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Concentration Of Norepinephrine On Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Brain [13]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to the classification of hemineglect syndrome. The unilateral neglect can be classified as egocentric or allocentric ignoring [14]. This classification is built based on the perception of spatial landmarks [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%