2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0143-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nails

Abstract: This study retrospectively analysed 34 patients with ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures treated over a period of 10 years between January 1995 and January 2005. They had an average age of 35 years. Twenty-six (76.47%) of these cases suffered high-velocity trauma (RTA); six others had fallen from a height (17.65%), and two had suffered only minimal trauma (5.88%). Twenty were extracapsular (58.82%) and 14 were intracapsular. They were evaluated with an average follow-up of 28 months, both clinically an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though recent literature shows favourable results with the use of a single implant i.e., reconstruction type of intramedullary nail, we are of the opinion that treating these combination of fractures with two separate devices (plate-screw combinations) does have a role. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In this study we compared the outcome of ipsilateral hip and shaft femur fractures treated with reconstruction-type intramedullary nailing and various plate combinations on the fracture healing and functional outcome in patients. Very few authors have compared these two methods of fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though recent literature shows favourable results with the use of a single implant i.e., reconstruction type of intramedullary nail, we are of the opinion that treating these combination of fractures with two separate devices (plate-screw combinations) does have a role. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In this study we compared the outcome of ipsilateral hip and shaft femur fractures treated with reconstruction-type intramedullary nailing and various plate combinations on the fracture healing and functional outcome in patients. Very few authors have compared these two methods of fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]  Various plate-screw combinations-including a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and long side plate combination, a hip screw with a short side plate for the neck and separate plate for the shaft or cancellous screws for femoral neck and a plate for the shaft. 13,14,16  Retrograde intramedullary nail of the shaft and screw fixation of the neck.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of this combination of fractures remains a challenge to surgeons. Surgical stabilization with implants is the preferred treatment method for ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures, according to most published reports 1–3,5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta‐analysis showed plate combinations had a high incidence of infection and non‐union, whereas unlocked intramedullary nail fixation was complicated by rotary malalignment and shortening 1 . The advantages of closed treatment of fractures with intramedullary nails have been well documented 1,5,6,9 . However, technical complications are encountered in reconstruction nailing, and a high incidence of nonunion and complications related to the knee occur with retrograde nailing 6,9–11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic was nicely described [1]. The treatment of ipsilateral fracture poses a challenging task for planning surgery with intra-operative and post-operative complications including, most devastating of all, non-union of fractured neck of femur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%