Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft. A treatment protocol.

Swiontkowski, Marc F.; Hansen, Sigvard T.; Kellam, James F

doi:10.2106/00004623-198466020-00013

Cited by 199 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

113

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, retrograde nailing has been recommended (Swiontkowski et al 1984). However, since femoral shaft fracture is the key component, it is reasonable to deduct that retrograde nailings, especially those requiring an open technique, can be recommended as little as for isolated shaft fractures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The percentage of missed primary diagnosis with a delay from one day to several months has been around 30 (Decoulx et al 1965, Mackenzie 1971, Bemstein 1974, Moschinski et al 1974, Nador et al 1975, Casey and Chapman 1979, Swiontkowski et al 1984, Gill et al 1990, Wiss et al 1992. The frequency of delayed and missed diagnosis depended on the diagnostic routine of the hospital and on the type of fracture.…”

Section: Delayed Diagnosis Of the Hip Fracturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Their only case of avascular necrosis was among the latter patients, the follow-up being, on average, 2 years. Swiontkowski et al (1984) reported a delay in the diagnosis of neck fracture in 3 of 15 cases, 2 of them being diagnosed after operative fixation of the diaphyseal fractures. Bennett et al (1993) fixed 17 of 37 femoral neck fractures after 1 week; 1 of 3 femoral neck nonunions were among these patients.…”

Section: Delayed Diagnosis Of the Hip Fracturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 153 cases with femoral neck fracture, the follow-up was 1 year or more (Table 3). Adding 14 cases of Swiontkowski et al (1984) with a follow-up of less than 1 year in some cases, 5 instances of avascular necrosis could be identified, a rate of 3%. The avascular necroses were not associated with the delay in diagnosis or the time of operation.…”

Section: Avascular Necrosis Of the Femoral Headmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft:A meta-analysis of 659 cases

Alho

1996

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Delayed Diagnosis Of the Hip Fracturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Delayed Diagnosis Of the Hip Fracturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Avascular Necrosis Of the Femoral Headmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft:A meta-analysis of 659 cases

Alho

1996

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fractures amid nailing might be expected to the entering gadget amid arrangement of the section point parallel addition of the femoral nail in a littlpatient, a neck-shaft point of more than 135°, the average prong of the inclusion jig,or front area of the passage gap [8] . Albeit joined ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft cracks are an uncommon damage design, it is basic to perceive the nearness of a related ipsilateral femoral neck fracture happening in conjunction with the more evident femoral shaft fracture.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: An analysis of two treatment methods

2017

Int. J. Orthop. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are extraordinary wounds that present a surgical challenge. It happens in roughly 6% to 9% of all femoral shaft fractures. In spite of this moderately basic introduction, decision-making frequently is troublesome. The principle target of this article is to think about treatment techniques in ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. Materials and Methods: A sum of 24 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft decision-making fractures were treated with PFNA-long or different plate mixes. We isolated patients into two gatherings. Gathering I included 13 patients who experienced surgery with cancellous lag screws or dynamic hip screws (DHS) joined with compression plate fixation. Gathering II included 11 patients who experienced surgery with reconstruction-type intramedullary nailing. Result: The mean age was 31 and 34 years in Group I and Group II, respectively. The normal follow-up periods were 19.9 and 20.2 months for bunches I and II, separately. Normal union time for femoral neck crack in Group I and Group II were 13.7 and 15.1 weeks, individually, and for shaft breaks, these time were 19 and 21 weeks, separately. There were 8 (61%) great, 4 (30%) reasonable practical outcomes in Group I. There were 8 (72%) great, 2 (19%) reasonable, and 1 (10%) poor practical outcomes in Group II. One instance of embed disappointment and nonunion of the femoral shaft fracture happened in group I. Conclusion: Both treatment strategies accomplished acceptable useful results in patients with ipsilateral basicervical femoral neck and shaft fractures.

show abstract

Retrograde Nailing of the Femur: Contemporary Indications and Technique

Probe

Lewis

Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft. A treatment protocol.

Cited by 199 publications

References 0 publications

Concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft:A meta-analysis of 659 cases

Concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft:A meta-analysis of 659 cases

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: An analysis of two treatment methods

Retrograde Nailing of the Femur: Contemporary Indications and Technique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About