1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90065-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ipsilateral connections of the anterior cingulate cortex with the frontal and medial temporal cortices in the macaque monkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological studies in monkeys have revealed that the frontopolar cortex connects with emotion processing regions, such as the amygdala, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the anterior cingulate, although its connection with the amygdala is sparse. [20][21][22] The connections of the lateral PFC with these regions are almost the same as those of the frontopolar cortex, but its connection with the anterior thalamic nuclei is sparse. 21 From an anatomical viewpoint, it is possible that the frontopolar and lateral PFCs are activated by receiving inputs from the emotion processing regions, in which visual stimuli-induced unpleasant emotions are initially processed.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Histological studies in monkeys have revealed that the frontopolar cortex connects with emotion processing regions, such as the amygdala, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the anterior cingulate, although its connection with the amygdala is sparse. [20][21][22] The connections of the lateral PFC with these regions are almost the same as those of the frontopolar cortex, but its connection with the anterior thalamic nuclei is sparse. 21 From an anatomical viewpoint, it is possible that the frontopolar and lateral PFCs are activated by receiving inputs from the emotion processing regions, in which visual stimuli-induced unpleasant emotions are initially processed.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For the construction of the neural networks, voxels identified by the seed PL S were selected based on their bootstrap ratio and their f unctional relevance to visual memory (as described in the literature on visual memory and related tasks; Orban and Vogels, 1998;Orban et al, 1998). The anatomical projections among the nodes of the network were determined based on the neuroanatomy of nonhuman primates (Petrides and Pandya, 1988;Pandya and Yeterian, 1990;Knierim andVan Essen, 1992, Gloor et al, 1993;Arikuni et al, 1994;Bachevalier et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parietal cortex has access to visual information from retinotopically organized areas in the visual cortex (Blatt et al 1990;Colby et al 1988;Galletti et al 1999aGalletti et al , 1999bPandya and Kuypers 1969;Shipp et al 1998), while PMd receives visuospatial information mainly via parietal areas (Pandya and Kuypers 1969;Wise et al 1997). PMd, instead, receives direct projections from the prefrontal cortex (Barbas 1988;Barbas and Mesulam 1985;Cavada et al 2000;Luppino et al 2003;Petrides and Pandya 1999;Selemon and Goldman-Rakic 1988), involved in abstract rule representation Miller 2003a, 2003b), as well as the anterior cingulate cortex (Arikuni et al 1994;Morecraft and Van Hoesen 1993;Pandya et al 1981). Previous studies suggest that both PRR and PMd are involved in the spatial representation of motor goals (Hartje and Ettlinger 1973;Mountcastle et al 1975;Murata et al 1996;Seal and Commenges 1985;Weinrich and Wise 1982;Wise et al 1986), including dual representations of potential motor goals during ambiguous reach planning (Cisek and Kalaska 2005;Klaes et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%