IPOL: A new journal for fully reproducible research; analysis of four years development

Colom, Miguel; Kerautret, Bertrand; Limare, Nicolas; Monasse, Pascal; Morel, Jean‐Michel

doi:10.1109/ntms.2015.7266500

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides these initiatives, we can mention many different conferences or workshops around research or academic software, such as the Engineering Academic Software (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16252) 29 (June 2016) 27 or the DANS 30 / SSI-Sustainable Software Sustainability Workshop 31 (March 2017) with a follow up in 2019 32 .…”

Section: Canarie 21 Is Canada's National Research and Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Gomez-Diaz

Recio

2019

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of the quality of research software is a challenging Background: and relevant issue, still not sufficiently addressed by the scientific community.Our contribution begins by defining, precisely but widely enough, Methods: the notions of research software and of its authors followed by a study of the evaluation issues, as the basis for the proposition of a sound assessment protocol: the CDUR procedure.CDUR comprises four steps introduced as follows: itation, to Results: C deal with correct RS identification, issemination, to measure good D dissemination practices, se, devoted to the evaluation of usability U aspects, and esearch, to assess the impact of the scientific work. R Some conclusions and recommendations are finally Conclusions:included. The evaluation of research is the keystone to boost the evolution of the Open Science policies and practices. It is as well our belief that research software evaluation is a fundamental step to induce better research software practices and, thus, a step towards more efficient science.

show abstract

Section: Canarie 21 Is Canada's National Research and Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although it does not fall in the category of general journals, we would also like to mention the Image Processing On Line Journal (IPOL) 54 (see 32), an Open Science and Reproducible Research journal. IPOL publishes image processing and image analysis articles, and the source code associated to the described algorithms.…”

Section: Publication Of Research Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Gomez-Diaz

Recio

2019

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…IPOL was born as a fully reproducible research journal [11], [12]. After more than ten years of experience, we have implemented standard procedures to ensure reproducible publications beyond the minimal requirements mentioned before [13].…”

Section: A the Ipol Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the IPOL Journal for Online Reproducible Research in Remote Sensing

Colom

Dagobert

Franchis

et al. 2020

IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations Remote Sensing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reproducible research is needed to ensure that scientific results in the literature are reliable, unbiased, and verifiable by others. The journal Image Processing On Line (IPOL) publishes reproducible articles since 2010. This means publishing an algorithm by a literary description, a pseudo-code, its source code, a series of test examples, an online facility allowing to test the code on this data and other data submitted by the user, and finally an experimental archive. In this work we discuss how to publish and review reproducible research in the specific discipline of remote sensing. We put a special emphasis on the construction and proper documentation of public datasets. We show case studies of remote sensing articles publicly available in IPOL, which demonstrate the feasibility of reproducible research in this area. The methods and their application are explained, along with details on how the datasets were built and made available for evaluation, comparison, and scoring to eventually help establish a reliable state of the art of the discipline. Finally, we give specific recommendations for authors and editors willing to publish reproducible research in remote sensing.

show abstract

“…Although it does not fall in the category of general journals, we would also like to mention the Image Processing On Line Journal (IPOL) 62 (see 37), an Open Science and Reproducible Research journal . IPOL publishes image processing and image analysis articles, and the source code associated to the described algorithms.…”

Section: Research Software: Definition Publication and Citationmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Gomez-Diaz

Recio

2019

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Evaluation of the quality of research software is a challenging and relevant issue, still not sufficiently addressed by the scientific community. Methods: Our contribution begins by defining, precisely but widely enough, the notions of research software and of its authors followed by a study of the evaluation issues, as the basis for the proposition of a sound assessment protocol: the CDUR procedure. Results: CDUR comprises four steps introduced as follows: Citation, to deal with correct RS identification, Dissemination, to measure good dissemination practices, Use, devoted to the evaluation of usability aspects, and Research, to assess the impact of the scientific work. Conclusions: Some conclusions and recommendations are finally included. The evaluation of research is the keystone to boost the evolution of the Open Science policies and practices. It is as well our belief that research software evaluation is a fundamental step to induce better research software practices and, thus, a step towards more efficient science.

show abstract

IPOL: A new journal for fully reproducible research; analysis of four years development

Cited by 11 publications

References 18 publications

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Using the IPOL Journal for Online Reproducible Research in Remote Sensing

On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About