2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0562-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IPO: a tool for automated optimization of XCMS parameters

Abstract: BackgroundUntargeted metabolomics generates a huge amount of data. Software packages for automated data processing are crucial to successfully process these data. A variety of such software packages exist, but the outcome of data processing strongly depends on algorithm parameter settings. If they are not carefully chosen, suboptimal parameter settings can easily lead to biased results. Therefore, parameter settings also require optimization. Several parameter optimization approaches have already been proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
202
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
202
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For determination of the involved parameter the toolbox IPO has been used (Libiseller et al, 2015). In the course of peak annotation, the intensity threshold was set to 10 3 and 13 C isotope peaks were removed using the Bioconductor package CAMERA (Kuhl et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determination of the involved parameter the toolbox IPO has been used (Libiseller et al, 2015). In the course of peak annotation, the intensity threshold was set to 10 3 and 13 C isotope peaks were removed using the Bioconductor package CAMERA (Kuhl et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular nature of the original XCMS software has made it interoperable with new generations of programs for untargeted metabolomics and enabled multiple research laboratories to improve upon the original XCMS algorithms. [14,15,41,42]…”
Section: Xcms Online: Metabolomics On the Cloudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotope coverage ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 means that no isotope clusters have been detected and 1 means that all peaks are part of isotope clusters. A higher isotope coverage indicates a higher peak picking quality as exploited in [19]. The PPS was proposed in [19] for the quantification of the peak picking quality and implemented in the R package IPO .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher isotope coverage indicates a higher peak picking quality as exploited in [19]. The PPS was proposed in [19] for the quantification of the peak picking quality and implemented in the R package IPO . The PPS is defined as the ratio between the number of reliable peaks squared and the number of non–reliable peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation