10th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 1997
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.204.1997_084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ip And Resistivity Survey At The Inel Cold Test Pit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prototype Geometrics OhniMapper was tested and data were cômpared to that collected with the traditional galvanic system by Aunga with excellent results. The OhniMapper resuits had a consistent upward bias when compared to the Auriga measurements and the system is very sensitive to coupling when small dipole antenna (25 m) are used, but data acquisition rates are very rapid.. Two-dimensional IP inversion resuits of dipole-dipole data are spectacular (Frangos, 1997) in defining the waste. The resistivity resuits mapped conductivity variations in both the host and the waste.…”
Section: Survey Description and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The prototype Geometrics OhniMapper was tested and data were cômpared to that collected with the traditional galvanic system by Aunga with excellent results. The OhniMapper resuits had a consistent upward bias when compared to the Auriga measurements and the system is very sensitive to coupling when small dipole antenna (25 m) are used, but data acquisition rates are very rapid.. Two-dimensional IP inversion resuits of dipole-dipole data are spectacular (Frangos, 1997) in defining the waste. The resistivity resuits mapped conductivity variations in both the host and the waste.…”
Section: Survey Description and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two goals of the study are (1) identifying methods for acquiring data that can support multidimensional inversion, and (2) that the data will be interpreted many times by different individuals and groups. Interpretation of the data is not the intention of this paper, but inversion results are an important part of the overall study: Alumbaugh and Newman (1997) are performing multidimensional inversion of data acquired with the loop-loop Slingram frequency domain method ;Frangos, (1997) has been working with colleagues on the induced polarhation data; and Tezkan and &her (1997) are performing 2-D inversion on data collected with the plane wave (magnetotelluric) method utilizing radio sources. Tests with the application of 1D inversion on the loop-loop data resulted in a model showing conductive bedrock at depth instead of a shallow conductora classic response for the case of 1D inversion over a highly 3D target.…”
Section: Disclamermentioning
confidence: 99%