IoTCop: A Blockchain-Based Monitoring Framework for Detection and Isolation of Malicious Devices in Internet-of-Things Systems

Seshadri, Sreenivas Sudarshan; Rodriguez, David; Subedi, Mukunda; Choo, Kim‐Kwang Raymond; Ahmed, Sara; Chen, Qian; Lee, Jung‐Hee

doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3022033

Cited by 26 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Blockchain technology can provide a secure distributed system framework on currently available information and communication technology (ICT) applications utilizing the latest cryptography, PKI, consensus, smart contract, and access control mechanisms. Blockchain technology has been widely adopted in IoT applications and e-commerce systems for secure communications, data sharing, and software security [114], [115]. In the energy sector, blockchain technology has been mostly studied in secure or privacy-preserved energy trading [116], [117].…”

Section: Network and Firmware Security Detection And Mitigation Metho...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Cyber–Physical Security for Photovoltaic Systems

You-hai

Giani

Elasser

et al. 2022

IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.-You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain -You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal -This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication.

show abstract

Section: Network and Firmware Security Detection And Mitigation Metho...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Cyber–Physical Security for Photovoltaic Systems

You-hai

Giani

Elasser

et al. 2022

IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Figure 8, it is shown that the validity of the blocks is verified by the check of the three level agents, which ensures the security of the data. The automatic handling of compromised devices can avoid dangerous behaviors time; Rodriguez [26] proposed a Hyperledger (Fabric)-based IoT device monitorin scheme. In Figure 5, the source and target devices are shown to verify the transaction r liability through the endorsing node in Hyperledger, and the dangerous devices are au tomatically isolated by chaincode.…”

Section: Iot Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Hyperledger for IoT: A Review of Reconstruction Diagrams Perspective

Leng

Wang²,

Zheng³

et al. 2022

Electronics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The convergence of blockchain with the internet of things (IoT) attracted widespread attention. Blockchain mainly solved the problem of secure storage and trusted transactions. The convergence of these two emerging technologies enhanced the security of smart services. However, there were some technical barriers to the deployment of practical IoT systems. In order to further promote the popularity and application of blockchain in the IoT, Hyperledger became the ideal technology to overcome these obstacles. In recent years, the mainstream application fields of IoT tried to carry out integration with Hyperledger to achieve high security, fine-grained privacy protection, real-time data flow, robustness, and other business requirements. However, there was a lack of literature review on this topic. This study obtained the latest related literature of Hyperledger in IoT from Web of Science, Wordlib, and EBSCO databases. To demonstrate more intuitive differences and provide a technology convergence process, this study proposes a reconstruction diagram analysis method. Reconstruction is the process of fusing the core design and the original architecture diagram in the literature and reconstructing the diagram so that it can show the core ideas of the literature. This approach aims to visualize the core ideas of the literature. Finally, this paper prospected and concluded by proposing four directions for future work, including a low-energy consensus algorithm, intelligent transaction validation, mixed on-chain and off-chain storage, and customized incentives.

show abstract

“…17 In "IoTCop," Seshadri et al utilize HyperLedger Fabric to monitor network traffic between edge devices and to isolate malicious devices that do not comply with the security policies. 32 However, in this work, we evaluate the viability of a blockchain-based monitoring system for communicating resource usage between lightweight devices on the far edge.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

HLF-Kubed: Blockchain-Based Resource Monitoring for Edge Clusters

Tzenetopoulos

Masouros

Kapsoulis

et al. 2022

ledger

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the past several years, there has been an increased usage of smart, always- connected devices at the edge of the network, which provide real-time contextual information with low overhead to optimize processes and improve how companies and individuals interact, work, and live. The efficient management of this huge pool of devices requires runtime moni- toring to identify potential performance bottlenecks and physical defects. Typical solutions, where monitoring data are aggregated in a centralized manner, soon become inefficient, as they are unable to handle the increased load and become single points of failure. In addition, the resource-constrained nature of edge devices calls for low-overhead monitoring systems. In this paper, we propose HLF-Kubed, a blockchain-based, highly available framework for monitoring edge devices, leveraging distributed ledger technology. HLF-Kubed builds upon Kubernetes container orchestrator and HyperLedger Fabric frameworks and implements a smart contract through an external chaincode for resource usage storing and querying. Our experimental results show that our proposed setup forms a low-overhead monitoring solution, with an average of 448 MB of memory and 6.8% CPU usage, while introducing 1.1s end-to- end latency for store operation and 0.6s for ledger querying respectively.

show abstract

IoTCop: A Blockchain-Based Monitoring Framework for Detection and Isolation of Malicious Devices in Internet-of-Things Systems

Cited by 26 publications

References 46 publications

A Review of Cyber–Physical Security for Photovoltaic Systems

A Review of Cyber–Physical Security for Photovoltaic Systems

Hyperledger for IoT: A Review of Reconstruction Diagrams Perspective

HLF-Kubed: Blockchain-Based Resource Monitoring for Edge Clusters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About