IoT-MAP: IoT mashup application platform for the flexible IoT ecosystem

Heo, Sehyeon; Woo, Sungpil; Im, Jungho; Kim, Dae-Young

doi:10.1109/iot.2015.7356561

Cited by 23 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another example is the use of multiple sources for the presentation of the "same" information, such as data on cultural heritage acquired from the Knowledge Base or through the use of Open Data (Data Mashup): the information is combined to have a much wider (unique) framework on the entity (work of art, point of interest, etc.) analyzed through various tools [28].…”

Section: Service Orchestration Wrappermentioning

confidence: 99%

An Approach for Recommending Contextualized Services in e-Tourism

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

«You take delight not in a city’s seven or seventy wonders, but in the answer it gives to a question of yours». Those are the words used by Italo Calvino in his book “Invisible Cities” to give us a key aspect of a city, and it is from this consideration that this research work starts. In particular, the aim is to study and develop innovative solutions that guarantee value for the territory and for the cultural and landscape assets that insist on it. At the same time, such innovative solutions should be able to make the answers, connected to these resources, “tailored” to the user who requested it. For this reason, an architecture will be described, which allows content generating actors and users to operate by means of a broker-platform. Through this platform, it is possible to search a content within a Knowledge Base and, through the automatic orchestration of services, to activate in a controlled way the access and fruition of the information contained in it.

show abstract

Section: Service Orchestration Wrappermentioning

confidence: 99%

An Approach for Recommending Contextualized Services in e-Tourism

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The breadth of IoT devices that exist today with varied capabilities and details has made it difficult to reach a widely adopted standard for representing and interacting with the various devices and services. While one solution might be for some standard to emerge for devices themselves, others have opted to instead create frameworks and systems to support the cataloguing and interactions for IoT devices with the goal of maximising interoperability between heterogeneous IoT devices and services [23,2,9,12,14]. Work done in [6] has also explored localised and directional queries of geo-tagged sensor data-sets in the hopes to not overwhelm users with potentially cluttered maps.…”

Section: Mapping the Iotmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards an Understanding of Emerging Cyber Security Threats in Mapping the IoT

Shaw

Mikusz

Trotter

et al. 2019

Living in the Internet of Things (IoT 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increase in IoT sensing and actuating devices that are seamlessly integrated into the environment is often leading to a mistrust of users as it becomes impossible to spot deployed IoT devices and understand their purposes and capabilities. One approach is to provide an appropriate mechanism of mapping the IoT and address stakeholder requirements. However, providing comprehensive maps of the IoT may expose a number of vulnerabilities that need to be addressed. We conducted a comprehensive literature survey outlining the limitations of the existing body of work regarding the mapping of the IoT and conducting an appropriate threat analysis. We subsequently applied the STRIDE model to two case studies (smart campus and urban environment) to identify a set of potential vulnerabilities and approaches at addressing these issues in the context of IoT maps.

show abstract

“…Many platforms have been proposed for solving the challenge of describing and cataloguing IoT devices, sensors, and services [6,13,20]. While having this data is clearly important, with no commonly adopted standard many of these systems appear not to be used beyond the initial period of research.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

IoT Maps

Shaw

Mikusz

Nurmi

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Things (IoT) devices are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in our everyday environments. While the number of devices and the degree of connectivity is growing, it is striking that as a society we are increasingly unaware of the locations and purposes of such devices. Indeed, much of the IoT technology being deployed is invisible and does not communicate its presence or purpose to the inhabitants of the spaces within which it is deployed. In this paper, we explore the potential benefits and challenges of constructing IoT maps that record the location of IoT devices. To illustrate the need for such maps, we draw on our experiences from multiple deployments of IoT systems. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Ubiquitous and mobile computing.

show abstract

IoT-MAP: IoT mashup application platform for the flexible IoT ecosystem

Cited by 23 publications

References 7 publications

An Approach for Recommending Contextualized Services in e-Tourism

An Approach for Recommending Contextualized Services in e-Tourism

Towards an Understanding of Emerging Cyber Security Threats in Mapping the IoT

IoT Maps

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About