IoT Device Security the Hard(ware) way

Schuß, Markus; Iber, Johannes; Dobaj, Jürgen; Kreiner, Christian; Boano, Carlo Alberto; Römer, Kay Uwe

doi:10.1145/3282308.3282329

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among them, OPV, PSCs, and CdTe based cells have lower cost. 45,66 In addition, within the range of 5 years, the OPV devices show lower costs if using the R2R method.…”

Section: Application Potential Of Ipvsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…In recent years, the research trend of energy efficiency and low power hardware protocols is to solve this problem, improve energy efficiency to reduce latency, and improve data reliability. 65,66 Fig. 1f shows the comparison of the production of system units based on lowvolume amorphous Si, III-V, PSCs, CdTe, and Si compounds with the annual production volume.…”

Section: Application Potential Of Ipvsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perovskite indoor photovoltaics: opportunity and challenges

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among them, OPV, PSCs, and CdTe based cells have lower cost. 45,66 In addition, within the range of 5 years, the OPV devices show lower costs if using the R2R method.…”

Section: Application Potential Of Ipvsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Application Potential Of Ipvsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perovskite indoor photovoltaics: opportunity and challenges

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the same direction but more on the trustfulness, paper Pahl et al (2018) proposes an architecture pattern based on blockchain to ensure the identity of hardware devices and software applications, the origin and integrity of data and the contractual nature of orchestration. There is only one paper (Schuß et al 2018) that proposes a pattern at the hardware layer for IoT security. Schuß et al (2018) show a pattern to secure the device through hardware, by implementing exchangeable cryptographic co-processors.…”

Section: Answering Rq22 How Well Do the Patterns And Architectures Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is only one paper (Schuß et al 2018) that proposes a pattern at the hardware layer for IoT security. Schuß et al (2018) show a pattern to secure the device through hardware, by implementing exchangeable cryptographic co-processors. This paper provides security features that can be implemented to a general IoT system, but it requires changes or additions to the hardware.…”

Section: Answering Rq22 How Well Do the Patterns And Architectures Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security of the Internet of Things (IoT)-based Smart Systems involving sensors, actuators and distributed control loop is of paramount importance but very difficult to address. Security patterns consist of domain-independent time-proven security knowledge and expertise. How are they useful for developing secure IoT-based smart systems? Are there architectures that support IoT security? We aim to systematically review the research work published on patterns and architectures for IoT security (and privacy). Then, we want to provide an analysis on that research landscape to answer our research questions. We follow the well-known guidelines for conducting systematic literature reviews. From thousands of candidate papers initially found in our search process, we have systematically distinguished and analyzed thirty-six (36) papers that have been peer-reviewed and published around patterns and architectures for IoT security and privacy in the last decade (January 2010–December 2020). Our analysis shows that there is a rise in the number of publications tending to patterns and architectures for IoT security in the last three years. We have not seen any approach of applying systematically architectures and patterns together that can address security (and privacy) concerns not only at the architectural level, but also at the network or IoT devices level. We also explored how the research contributions in the primary studies handle the different issues from the OWASP Internet of Things (IoT) top ten vulnerabilities list. Finally, we discuss the current gaps in this research area and how to fill in the gaps for promoting the utilization of patterns for IoT security and privacy by design.

show abstract

“…Security pattern RQ1. Data must be encrypted Symmetric encryption [Fernandez B, 2013 Hardware IoT [Schuß et al, 2018] Table 2: Security requirements of the hydroponic crop and the security patterns used to address them although it can be stated that the objective of the CPS is "the creation of a hydroponic crop from scratch in order to study the typical elements of CPS, along with its specific security needs". With regard to the orchestration layer, it is mainly in charge of defining the requirements that must be satisfied by the CPS.…”

Section: Security Requirementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Reference Architecture for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)

Moreno¹,

Rosado²,

Sánchez³

et al. 2021

jucs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are the next generation of engineered systems into which computing, communication, and control technologies are now being closely integrated. They play an increasingly important role in critical infrastructures, governments and everyday life. Security is crucial in CPS, but they were not, unfortunately, initially conceived as a secure environment, and if these security issues are to be incorporated, then security must be considered from the very beginning of the system design. One way in which to solve this problem is by having a global perspective, which can be achieved by employing a Reference Architecture (RA), since it is a high-level abstraction of a system that could be useful in the implementation of complex systems. It is widely accepted that adding elements in order to address many security factors (integrity, confidentiality, availability, etc.) and facilitate the definition of the security requirements of a Security Reference Architecture (SRA) is a good starting point when attempting to solve these kinds of cybersecurity problems and protect the system from the beginning of the development. An SRA makes it possible to define the key elements of a specific environment, thus allowing a better understanding of the inherent elements of the environments, while promoting the integration of security aspects and mechanisms. The present paper, therefore, presents the definition of an SRA for CPS by using UML models in an attempt to facilitate secure CPS implementations.

show abstract

IoT Device Security the Hard(ware) way

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Perovskite indoor photovoltaics: opportunity and challenges

Perovskite indoor photovoltaics: opportunity and challenges

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

Security Reference Architecture for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

IoT Device Security the Hard(ware) way

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Perovskite indoor photovoltaics: opportunity and challenges

Perovskite indoor photovoltaics: opportunity and challenges

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

Security Reference Architecture for Cyber-Physical&nbsp;Systems (CPS)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Security Reference Architecture for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)