IoT-based Systems Actuation Conflicts Management Towards DevOps: A Systematic Mapping Study

Lavirotte, Stéphane; Rocher, Gérald; Tigli, Jean‐Yves; Gonnin, Thibaut

doi:10.5220/0009355102270234

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach then makes it possible to integrate the simulation as a service accessible using mobile devices (smartphones) or to integrate mobile devices (or sensors and embedded components) as a source of data for the simulation [44]. In recent years, tools have appeared, including M&S environments of ubiquitous systems or networks of connected objects [45].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a DEVS Model Management System for Decision-Making Web Applications

Capocchi

Santucci

2023

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The discrete event system specification formalism introduced by Zeigler in the 1970s is ideally associated with new technological advances in the web to offer an almost quasi-automatic mechanism for exporting its simulation models associated with experimental frames into web apps. In this paper, we show how, thanks to the association of certain current web concepts (cloud computing, application virtualization, etc.), discrete event system specification formalism makes it easier to develop web apps that use simulation models to assist decision-making. We propose a simulation model management system used by teams of data scientists, modelers, and developers (engineers) capable of building and deploying web applications from simulation models with minimal web development knowledge.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a DEVS Model Management System for Decision-Making Web Applications

Capocchi

Santucci

2023

Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There have been some recent surveys focusing on different aspects of IoT engineering, from the deployment support (Nguyen et al 2019) to actuation conflict management (Lavirotte et al 2020). In Nguyen et al (2019), the authors present the state of the art of IoT deployment approaches in which most approaches do not properly support software deployment and orchestration at the tiny IoT device level.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The new challenges in the IoT domain can also be seen in the physical layer of IoT actuators. The SMS in Lavirotte et al (2020) brings attention to the risk of actuation effects to safety and trustworthiness, and analyzes approaches for actuation conflicts management. However, these two recent surveys do not focus on security patterns for IoT.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security of the Internet of Things (IoT)-based Smart Systems involving sensors, actuators and distributed control loop is of paramount importance but very difficult to address. Security patterns consist of domain-independent time-proven security knowledge and expertise. How are they useful for developing secure IoT-based smart systems? Are there architectures that support IoT security? We aim to systematically review the research work published on patterns and architectures for IoT security (and privacy). Then, we want to provide an analysis on that research landscape to answer our research questions. We follow the well-known guidelines for conducting systematic literature reviews. From thousands of candidate papers initially found in our search process, we have systematically distinguished and analyzed thirty-six (36) papers that have been peer-reviewed and published around patterns and architectures for IoT security and privacy in the last decade (January 2010–December 2020). Our analysis shows that there is a rise in the number of publications tending to patterns and architectures for IoT security in the last three years. We have not seen any approach of applying systematically architectures and patterns together that can address security (and privacy) concerns not only at the architectural level, but also at the network or IoT devices level. We also explored how the research contributions in the primary studies handle the different issues from the OWASP Internet of Things (IoT) top ten vulnerabilities list. Finally, we discuss the current gaps in this research area and how to fill in the gaps for promoting the utilization of patterns for IoT security and privacy by design.

show abstract