2016 IEEE 25th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isie.2016.7744911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IoT-based integration of IEC 61131 industrial automation systems: The case of UML4IoT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is important as IoT research has so far mainly focused on technical and engineering challenges (Atzori et al, 2010;Kortuem et al, 2010), simple scenarios, and individual smart things (Oberländer et al, 2018;Püschel et al, 2016). The few works that allow for the modelling of IoTenabled scenarios are technical and restricted to specific domains (eg, Christoulakis & Thramboulidis, 2016;De et al, 2011;Meyer et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2012). For the same reasons, the DSML increases service-related knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is important as IoT research has so far mainly focused on technical and engineering challenges (Atzori et al, 2010;Kortuem et al, 2010), simple scenarios, and individual smart things (Oberländer et al, 2018;Püschel et al, 2016). The few works that allow for the modelling of IoTenabled scenarios are technical and restricted to specific domains (eg, Christoulakis & Thramboulidis, 2016;De et al, 2011;Meyer et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2012). For the same reasons, the DSML increases service-related knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has become evident during our study and as we will justify in the evaluation section based on selected conceptual modelling approaches, existing works neither fully account for the characteristics of SSS nor for concepts enabled by the IoT. The same holds for modelling approaches from the IoT domain, most of which focus on technical details, are restricted to distinct domains, or can only handle small‐scale scenarios (Christoulakis & Thramboulidis, ; De, Barnaghi, Bauer, & Meissner, ; Meyer, Ruppen, & Magerkurth, ; Oberländer et al, ; Xu, Xu, Li, Lv, & Liu, ). Although the value of these approaches is indisputable, we do not know of any approach located at the intersection of the service and the IoT domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, very few improved versions of the UML and SysML have been developed in the context of Industry 4.0. Examples include UML for IoT (UML4IoT) (Christoulakis and Thramboulidis, 2016) and PrivacyUML (PrivUML), the latter of which is related to cybersecurity and data protection domain (Mokhtari et al, 2019). SysML also has a potential that is not yet well studied in the context of Industry 4.0.…”
Section: Uml and Sysml Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pabrikasi alat pemantauan juga didukung oleh perkembangan teknologi informasi melalui kehadiran inovasi teknologi, salah satunya berupa Internet of thing (IoT) [1]. Saat ini IoT telah diimlementasi pada bidang pertanian [2], kesehatan [3], monitoring parkir [4], dan industry [5] dengan dukungan teknologi IoT untuk pemantauan [6] dan pengkontrolan [7]. Penelitian terkait dengan distribusi air telah dilakukan sebelumnya, seperti sistem pemantauan air secara realtime berbasis web [8] dengan penempatan sensor MPX5700AP untuk pengukuran tekanan air.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified