2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.02.365437
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IonQuant enables accurate and sensitive label-free quantification with FDR-controlled match-between-runs

Abstract: Missing values weaken the power of label-free quantitative proteomic experiments to uncover true quantitative differences between biological samples or experimental conditions. Match-between-runs (MBR) has become a common approach to mitigate the missing value problem, where peptides identified by tandem mass spectra in one run are transferred to another by inference based on m/z, charge state, retention time, and ion mobility when applicable. Though tolerances are used to ensure such transferred identificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Label free quantitation was conducted with IonQuant (Yu et al, 2020) and Match-Between-Runs enabled (with default parameters) and using Top-3 quantitation. Feature detection tolerance was set to 10ppm and RT Window to 0.6 minutes with an IM Window of 0.05 1/k0.…”
Section: Primary Data Analysis (Identification and Quantitation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label free quantitation was conducted with IonQuant (Yu et al, 2020) and Match-Between-Runs enabled (with default parameters) and using Top-3 quantitation. Feature detection tolerance was set to 10ppm and RT Window to 0.6 minutes with an IM Window of 0.05 1/k0.…”
Section: Primary Data Analysis (Identification and Quantitation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that this drastic reduction in replicate overlap again is mostly caused by the stochastic selection of precursors in DDA strategies. Even though label-free measurements now allow for FDR-controlled match between runs based on MS1 features 25 , we are confident that the transition to DIA measurements will improve replicate overlap and quantification correlation. Further, we speculated that the fast duty cycles and the increased usage of the ion beam of PASEF on the timsTOF Pro will benefit our label-free single cell analysis.…”
Section: Label-free Single Cell Proteome Acquisition With the Proteochipmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Label-free proteome analysis has several advantages over multiplexed sample workflows, like the direct MS1 based quantification, the possibility of highly confident feature matching between analytical runs and the reduced chemical noise introduced by the labeling. 25,26 We therefore evaluated the proteoCHIP protocol in the analysis of label-free single cell samples, using shorter gradients based on the vastly reduced sample input (i.e. 30 minutes compared to 60 minutes for TMT-labeled samples).…”
Section: Label-free Single Cell Proteome Acquisition With the Proteochipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IonQuant, for FDR controlled MBR in a re‐analysis of sparse single‐cell datasets resulted in less false positives when transferring identifications. This might become extremely effective for label‐free single‐cell proteomics studies to confidently transfer identifications from a higher input sample to single‐cell runs 90 . Careful quality control and stringent filtering of scarce data is important in MS‐based proteomics and becomes critical for the biological conclusions based on single‐cell measurements.…”
Section: Post‐processing and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%