Ionospheric response to geomagnetic disturbances in the north-eastern region of Asia during the minimum of 23rd cycle of solar activity

Kurkin, V. I.; Pirog, O. M.; Полех, Н. М.; Михалев, А. В.; Poddelsky, Igor; Stepanov, A.E.

doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2008.09.022

Cited by 14 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The observational data of the ionospheric effects of these geomagnetic storms at various midlatitude stations have been presented and analyzed by Goncharenko et al [2007] and Kurkin et al [2008]. Ionospheric effects of these storms have been also analyzed with two global numerical models: TIEGCM (Thermosphere‐Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model) [ Lu et al , 2008] and GSM TIP model [ Klimenko et al , 2009, 2010, 2011].…”

Section: Description Of the Modeled Event And Statement Of The Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical modeling of ionospheric effects in the middle‐ and low‐latitude F region during geomagnetic storm sequence of 9–14 September 2005

Клименко

Ratovsky

et al. 2011

Radio Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents the Global Self‐Consistent Model of the Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) numerical simulations of the 9–14 September 2005 geomagnetic storm effects in the middle‐ and low‐latitude ionosphere. Recent modifications to the GSM TIP model include adding an empirical model of high‐energy electron precipitation and introducing a high‐resolution (1 min) calculation of region 2 field‐aligned currents and a cross‐cap potential difference. These modifications resulted in better representation of such effects as penetration of the magnetospheric convection electric field to lower latitudes and the overshielding. The model also includes simulation of solar flare effects. Comparison of model results with observational data at Millstone Hill (42.6°N, 71.5°W, USA), Arecibo (18.3°N, 66.8°W, Puerto Rico), Jicamarca (11.9°S, 76.9°W, Peru), Palmas (10.2°S, 48.2°W, Brazil), and San Jose Campos (23.2°S, 45.9°W, Brazil) shows good agreement of ionospheric disturbances caused by this storm sequence. In this paper we consider in detail the formation mechanism of the additional layers in an equatorial ionosphere during geomagnetic storms. During geomagnetic storms, the nonuniform in height zonal electric field is generated at the geomagnetic equator. This electric field forms the additional layers in the F region of equatorial ionosphere.

show abstract

Section: Description Of the Modeled Event And Statement Of The Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical modeling of ionospheric effects in the middle‐ and low‐latitude F region during geomagnetic storm sequence of 9–14 September 2005

Клименко

Ratovsky

et al. 2011

Radio Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

F2 layer response to geomagnetic disturbances in Eastern Asia under the low solar activity

Pirog

Полех

Романова

et al. 2010

Advances in Space Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disturbances in the ionospheric F-region peak heights in the American longitudinal sector during geomagnetic storms of September 2005

Клименко

Ratovsky

et al. 2011

Advances in Space Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ionospheric response to geomagnetic disturbances in the north-eastern region of Asia during the minimum of 23rd cycle of solar activity

Cited by 14 publications

References 21 publications

Numerical modeling of ionospheric effects in the middle‐ and low‐latitude F region during geomagnetic storm sequence of 9–14 September 2005

Numerical modeling of ionospheric effects in the middle‐ and low‐latitude F region during geomagnetic storm sequence of 9–14 September 2005

F2 layer response to geomagnetic disturbances in Eastern Asia under the low solar activity

Disturbances in the ionospheric F-region peak heights in the American longitudinal sector during geomagnetic storms of September 2005

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About