2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-012-4784-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionospheric longitudinal variations at midlatitudes: Incoherent scatter radar observation at Millstone Hill

Abstract: Incoherent scatter radar (ISR) extra-wide coverage experiments during the period of 1978-2011 at Millstone Hill are used to investigate longitudinal differences in electron density. This work is motivated by a recent finding of the US east-west coast difference in TEC suggesting a combined effect of changing geomagnetic declination and zonal winds. The current study provides strong supporting evidence of the longitudinal change and the plausible mechanism by examining the climatology of electron density Ne on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
29
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(17 reference statements)
6
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The daytime density is normally lower in the east-most site than in the west site, and this turns opposite during the nighttime. These results agree well with the recent studies (Zhang et al, 2011(Zhang et al, , 2012. These longitudinal differences are caused by the difference in magnetic declination which gives rise to upward and downward ion drifts across the zero declination for a given thermospheric zonal wind direction.…”
Section: Diurnal Variation Of Tecsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The daytime density is normally lower in the east-most site than in the west site, and this turns opposite during the nighttime. These results agree well with the recent studies (Zhang et al, 2011(Zhang et al, , 2012. These longitudinal differences are caused by the difference in magnetic declination which gives rise to upward and downward ion drifts across the zero declination for a given thermospheric zonal wind direction.…”
Section: Diurnal Variation Of Tecsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was suggested that this marked longitudinal differences in ionospheric TEC over the continent US and Ne in the F‐region heights over the eastern US at midlatitudes was caused by a combined effect of the varying declination and thermospheric zonal winds [ Zhang et al , 2011, 2012]. The longitudinal variation of magnetic declination (including its reversal in the central US) and the climatology in the zonal winds (which vary with local time, season and solar activity) could explain the observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both the northeast of East Asia and the continental US, the electron density diurnal variations show some similarity to the WSA in summer (Lin et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2010). Interestingly, Zhang et al (2011Zhang et al ( , 2012a showed that in the North American sector, the most significant longitudinal difference occurs during nighttime in winter and the solar minimum, which is possibly associated with the strongest nighttime zonal winds. Their results present a vital contribution of the zonal wind to electron density longitudinal variations under special magnetic configuration, i.e., a magnetic declination change between westward (negative) and eastward (positive) at midlatitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Similar but much weaker summer evening enhancements also occur in the North American sector and East Asian sector (Lin et al, 2009(Lin et al, , 2010, known as midlatitude summer nighttime anomaly (MSNA). Several mechanisms are applied to explain these interesting phenomena, including the equatorward neutral wind, electric field, photoionization and the downward plasma diffusion from the plasmasphere (Burns et al, 2008(Burns et al, , 2011Jee et al, 2009;He et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2011Chen et al, , 2012Liu et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2011Zhang et al, , 2012aZhao et al, 2013). Among those explanations, the magnetic configuration and the neutral winds are considered as important and even major contributors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation