2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-020-0964-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionosphere time series modeling using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and principal component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, existing statistical methods used to forecast regional TEC are based on relatively simple theoretical models. Among the existing approaches, Prophet time‐series forecasting (Zhai et al., 2019), auto‐regressive moving average (ARMA) (Krankowski et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2013), statistical Holt–Winter (Elmunim et al., 2017), manifold trajectories (Moreno et al., 2018), support vector machine (Pei et al., 2019), artificial neural network (ANN) (Habarulema et al., 2007), EXtreme Gradient Boosting over Decision Trees (Zhukov et al., 2020), and hybrid methods (Feizi et al., 2020; Ghaffari & Vosooghi, 2020; Mukhtarov et al., 2014; Uwamahoro & Habarulema, 2015) are extensively used. Recently, various neural network (NN)‐based models have been developed for the prediction of regional TEC (Tebabal et al., 2018, 2019) A NN is a collection of algorithms modeled after the function of neurons in the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing statistical methods used to forecast regional TEC are based on relatively simple theoretical models. Among the existing approaches, Prophet time‐series forecasting (Zhai et al., 2019), auto‐regressive moving average (ARMA) (Krankowski et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2013), statistical Holt–Winter (Elmunim et al., 2017), manifold trajectories (Moreno et al., 2018), support vector machine (Pei et al., 2019), artificial neural network (ANN) (Habarulema et al., 2007), EXtreme Gradient Boosting over Decision Trees (Zhukov et al., 2020), and hybrid methods (Feizi et al., 2020; Ghaffari & Vosooghi, 2020; Mukhtarov et al., 2014; Uwamahoro & Habarulema, 2015) are extensively used. Recently, various neural network (NN)‐based models have been developed for the prediction of regional TEC (Tebabal et al., 2018, 2019) A NN is a collection of algorithms modeled after the function of neurons in the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile the 4‐4‐4‐4 number of input MFs results in 256 rules. High number of rules would make the model too complex, and increases the convergence time of the model to the optimal solution (Alambeigi et al., 2016; Razin & Voosoghi, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it introduces fuzziness into the NN, the combination of this model can increase the accuracy of results. Existing research reveals that the ANFIS shows better performance than the classical NN in TEC modeling at the low solar activity [30]. Thus, this model is most likely to be used in TEC forecasting under severe weather conditions in terms of its fuzziness characteristic.…”
Section: Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System (Anfis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The machine learning algorithms can automatically learn the implicit nonlinear relationship between the TEC value and the external indicators, which helps to improve the prediction performance in extreme environments. A few machine learning approaches have been used in the ionosphere prediction, such as the standard Neural Network (NN) approach [14]- [16], Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [17]- [19], Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) [20] etc. Their performance has been evaluated and has been compared with the GIM and IRI-2016 models and the results show that these machine learning algorithms outperform the existing models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%