2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204258
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionizing radiation modulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression through multiple mitogen activated protein kinase dependent pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(73 reference statements)
3
81
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with Davies et al's findings on the enhanced penetration and the improved intratumoral distribution of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin in response to radiotherapy, these observations suggest that radiotherapy beneficially affects both arms of the EPR effect: on the one hand, by e.g. enhancing the expression of VEGF (Li et al, 2000;Park et al, 2001), it likely increases the permeability of the tumour blood vessels towards long-circulating nanomedicines, and on the other hand, by e.g. reducing the tumour cell density (Peschke et al, 1999) and the interstitial fluid pressure (Znati et al, 1996), it likely enhances their retention and their intratumoral distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Together with Davies et al's findings on the enhanced penetration and the improved intratumoral distribution of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin in response to radiotherapy, these observations suggest that radiotherapy beneficially affects both arms of the EPR effect: on the one hand, by e.g. enhancing the expression of VEGF (Li et al, 2000;Park et al, 2001), it likely increases the permeability of the tumour blood vessels towards long-circulating nanomedicines, and on the other hand, by e.g. reducing the tumour cell density (Peschke et al, 1999) and the interstitial fluid pressure (Znati et al, 1996), it likely enhances their retention and their intratumoral distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Besides reflecting, for instance, on the integrity and function of the tumour vasculature (V), and on the expression of certain cellular receptors (R), it is also known to affect several cell membrane-related (C), nuclear (N), mitochondrial (M) and signalling (S) processes. By eliciting such effects, radiotherapy has been shown to induce (I) an increase in the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Park et al, 2001) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) (Lee et al, 1995), (II) an increase in apoptosis and endothelial cell apoptosis (Garcia-Barros et al, 2003), (III) a decrease in tumour cell density (Peschke et al, 1999), and (IV) a reduction in interstitial fluid pressure (Znati et al, 1996). By means of the former phenomenon, radiotherapy is considered to be able to increase the permeability of the vasculature towards long-circulating nanomedicines (Samaniego et al, 1998;Feng et al, 1999), and by means of the latter three, it likely improves their penetration and their intratumoral distribution (Jain, 1994;Netti et al, 1995;Au et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of using the PEG-Prom in these cancer contexts is its apparent ubiquitous cancer specificity. PEA-3 and AP-1 transactivation and subsequently PEG-Prom activity are positively regulated by the ras-dependent signaling cascade (18,19,44). Because activation of the ras pathway is a frequent event in diverse cancers, including breast cancer, the ability of the PEG-Prom to drive transgene expression in these cancers will be robust and specific (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteasome inhibition would be expected to prevent NF-kB activation, but numerous studies have shown radiation to activate it (Li and Karin, 1998;Raju et al, 1998). Activation of NF-kB is considered to mediate radiation-induced proinflammatory responses, and irradiation of cells and tissues increases expression of proinflammatory chemokines (Johnston et al, 2002) and cytokines such as TNF-a (Hallahan et al, 1989;Chiang et al, 1993), IL-1a and -b (Hong et al, 1994;Hosoi et al, 2001), IL-5 (Lu-Hesselmann et al, 1997), IL-6 (Abeyama et al, 1995;Beetz et al, 1997), GM-CSF (Zhang et al, 1994), IFN-a (Woloschak et al, 1990), bFGF (Haimovitz-Friedman et al, 1991), and VEGF (Gorski et al, 1999;Park et al, 2001), as well as proinflammatory cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 (Behrends et al, 1994;Hong et al, 1994;Gaugler et al, 1997), E-selectin (Hallahan et al, 1995), and VCAM-1 (Heckmann et al, 1998)), prostaglandins and leukotrienes (Eisen et al, 1977;Iwamoto and McBride, 1992), proteases (Hong et al, 1994;Patel et al, 1998;Fittkau et al, 2001), and prooxidant species. If the damage is not too severe, this is normally counterbalanced in time by production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, antiproteases, antioxidants, and heat-shock proteins leading to resolution of the inflammation (Barcellos-Hoff, 1993;Sierra-Rivera et al, 1993;Broski and Halloran, 1994;Sadekova et al, 1997;Roedel et al, 2002).…”
Section: Cellular Consequences Of Modulation Of Proteasome Activity Bmentioning
confidence: 99%