1951
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.84.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization Potentials and Probabilities Using a Mass Spectrometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative uncertainty δ( σ el )/ σ el , estimated by comparing the calculated dσ el /d with available experimental data [19,20], amounted to 50%. The derivative ∂σ t /∂T was determined using the cubic interpolation of the experimental results and δT was set equal to the uncertainty of the calibration of the electron energy that has been carried out before by means of the retarding field method [11,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative uncertainty δ( σ el )/ σ el , estimated by comparing the calculated dσ el /d with available experimental data [19,20], amounted to 50%. The derivative ∂σ t /∂T was determined using the cubic interpolation of the experimental results and δT was set equal to the uncertainty of the calibration of the electron energy that has been carried out before by means of the retarding field method [11,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21). According to the formula of Collins and Norcross [35], which is based on the first Born approximation for a rotating dipole, the integral cross section for rotational excitation is given by…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retarding potential difference involves the manipulation of electrons thermionically emitted from a filament in such a way that a beam of ''quasi-monoenergetic'' electrons is simulated (see Fox, Hickam, & Grove, 1951;Fox, Hickam, & Kjeldaas, 1953;Fox et al, 1955). The energy distribution of electrons from a filament possesses a wide energy distribution ($0.5 eV FWHM) due to the one-dimensional Maxwell Boltzmann energy distribution.…”
Section: A Retarding Potential Difference (Rpd) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the measurement of negative-ion appearance potentials is considerably more difficult than that of positive-ion appearance potentials. The retarding potential difference method of Fox et al (1951) has given results on standard reference materials to within 0.1 eV of the spectroscopic values for positive ions. Comparable accuracy can be expected when this method is used for negative ions.…”
Section: Charge Permutation [A'b + ] + Ab -> [A'b-] + (Ab) (3-14)mentioning
confidence: 98%