1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.76.2882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization of Hydrogen and Hydrogenic Ions by Antiprotons

Abstract: Presented here is a description of the ionization of hydrogen and hydrogenic

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. This calculation is essentially a contem porary version o f that w hich we carried out in 1996 to elucidate the m echanism s leading to the behavior o f ionization o f atom s by antiproton im pact [15,16], for exam ple, the dynam ical exceeding o f the Ferm i-Teller lim it at low energies, and w hich was confirm ed by other authors (see, e.g., Ref. [17]).…”
Section: Angular Momentum Transfer In Ion-atom Collisionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…1. This calculation is essentially a contem porary version o f that w hich we carried out in 1996 to elucidate the m echanism s leading to the behavior o f ionization o f atom s by antiproton im pact [15,16], for exam ple, the dynam ical exceeding o f the Ferm i-Teller lim it at low energies, and w hich was confirm ed by other authors (see, e.g., Ref. [17]).…”
Section: Angular Momentum Transfer In Ion-atom Collisionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Since is small, the ionization cross section turns out to take large values even near the threshold (E I + ); such a feature was reported in a QM study forp + H [33]. The obvious alteration in the behavior of the capture cross section just above the ionization threshold was reported also in the FMD and classical trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) calculations for the captures by H and He targets [13,32,34,35]. For heavier targets including Li atoms, however, the FMD calculation shows rather a smooth behavior around the first ionization threshold [13,32]: At the energy E = 8.16 eV (0.3 a.u.)…”
Section: B Total Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…and has the local maximum at R TP 1.1 a.u., which is slightly smaller than R 0 in Eq. (35). Cohen carried out the FMD calculation of the total capture cross sections inp + Li [13].…”
Section: B Total Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schultz et al [19] have noted that for internuclear separations larger than the Fermi-Teller radius R FT = 0.64a o [20], the pp dipole is sufficient to support bound molecular electronic states, but as the internuclear separation is reduced, these states correlate to states at the ionization threshold; there are no bound molecular states for smaller internuclear distances. The Fermi-Teller area πR 2 FT = 3.6 × 10 −17 cm 2 is thus a lower bound to the low energyp-H ionization cross section.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%