1955
DOI: 10.1063/1.1715198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization in a Mass Spectrometer by Monoenergetic Electrons

Abstract: Over the last few years, a method has been developed for obtaining ionization probability curves with essentially monoenergetic electrons. A retarding potential is applied to the electron beam to yield an energy distribution with a sharp low-energy limit. By varying the retarding potential slightly, a new low-energy limit of the distribution can be selected. The difference in the ionization produced in the two cases is ionization by those electrons with a small energy spread selected from the original distribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar behavior has been observed in the secondary electron yield of bulk KC1, which shows a shallow minimum at -20 eV (Hilsch, 1932;Bruining, 1954), and electron energy loss measurements on bulk alkane films exhibit a broad peak at -22.5 eV (Hiraoka and Hamill, 1973). The shift of -3-4 eV between the location of the minima in our measurements and literature values is probably due to differences in the energy reference levels for the experiments, which depend on contact potentials at the filament and electron gun surfaces (Fox et al, 1955). The energy can be calibrated using a gas of known ionization potential but requires a mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Secondary Electron Yields: Coated Particlesmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Similar behavior has been observed in the secondary electron yield of bulk KC1, which shows a shallow minimum at -20 eV (Hilsch, 1932;Bruining, 1954), and electron energy loss measurements on bulk alkane films exhibit a broad peak at -22.5 eV (Hiraoka and Hamill, 1973). The shift of -3-4 eV between the location of the minima in our measurements and literature values is probably due to differences in the energy reference levels for the experiments, which depend on contact potentials at the filament and electron gun surfaces (Fox et al, 1955). The energy can be calibrated using a gas of known ionization potential but requires a mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Secondary Electron Yields: Coated Particlesmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Pesu its again in a larger absolute value of e r £ than calculated, although the increase is not as large as in (2). If the increase in is large enough the ions are not represented in the output signal.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This simplification can be justified by examining the consequences (1) at resonance, (2) near resonance, and ( 3 ) far from resonance.…”
Section: Practical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations