2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization energies of tungsten ions: W2+ through W71+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the excitation energy varies from 152 eV in the top panel to 293 eV in the bottom panel, the evolution of emission bands may be followed, but individual features associated with specific charge states are difficult to identify at this resolution. Although having an uncertainty of a few tens of electron volts in the EBIT excitation energy, the ionization energy of 141.2 eV for Ho-like W 7+ [3] suggests that the complex tungsten emission starts with the Dy-like W IX spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the excitation energy varies from 152 eV in the top panel to 293 eV in the bottom panel, the evolution of emission bands may be followed, but individual features associated with specific charge states are difficult to identify at this resolution. Although having an uncertainty of a few tens of electron volts in the EBIT excitation energy, the ionization energy of 141.2 eV for Ho-like W 7+ [3] suggests that the complex tungsten emission starts with the Dy-like W IX spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron-beam energy was varied in the range from 31 up to 293 eV, which should cover many of the low tungsten charge states [3]. Figures 1 and 2 show observed spectra at ten beam energies.…”
Section: Survey Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ground configurations of tungsten ions were taken from the latest revised data [17], they coincide with configurations obtained in single configuration quasirelativistic approximation, except q = 12, where the calculation gives the lowest level corresponding to a 4f 13 5s 2 5p configuration instead of a 4f 14 5s 2 configuration following from experimental data.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 3, the comparison of tabulated ionization potentials [19] for of tungsten ions with the Thomas-Fermi model values calculated from Equation (8) is presented. As can be seen by the figure, the statistical model quite reasonably approximates the available data [19].…”
Section: Ionization Potentials and Average Chargementioning
confidence: 99%