Abstract:Unlike α- and γ-mode operation, electrons accelerated by strong drift and ambipolar electric fields in the plasma bulk and at the sheath edges are found to dominate the ionization in strongly electronegative discharges. These fields are caused by a low bulk conductivity and local maxima of the electron density at the sheath edges, respectively. This drift-ambipolar mode is investigated by kinetic particle simulations, experimental phase-resolved optical emission spectroscopy, and an analytical model in CF(4). … Show more
“…In this Ω-mode [27], a high electric field builds up in the bulk region due to the low electrical conductivity caused by the high electron-neutral collision frequency -this drift field accelerates electrons to high energies to create ionization in the bulk. Similar electron heating and ionization dynamics in the bulk region have been found in dusty plasmas [28][29][30] as well as in discharges operated in various electronegative gases [7,8,[15][16][17][18][19][31][32][33][34][35]. While in case of dust contaminated plasmas the origin of the low electrical conductivity (and that of the high electric field) in the bulk is the loss of charged particles the dust particles, in electronegative plasmas the depleted electron density is due to electron attachment in the discharge center.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…CF 4 discharges exhibit a complex chemistry and become strongly electronegative under typical operating conditions. Under these conditions the plasma composition, the electron heating and ionization dynamics, and the discharge operation differ significantly from those of electropositive discharges [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Two types of capacitive dual-frequency discharges, used in plasma processing applications to achieve the separate control of the ion flux, Г i , and the mean ion energy, , at the electrodes, operated in CF 4 , are investigated by particle-in-cell simulations: (i) In classical dual-frequency discharges, driven by significantly different frequencies (1.937 MHz + 27.12 MHz), and Г i are controlled by the voltage amplitudes of the low-frequency and high-frequeny components, Φ LF and Φ HF , respectively.(ii) In electrically asymmetric (EA) discharges, operated at a fundamental frequency and its second harmonic (13.56 MHz + 27.12 MHz), Φ LF and Φ HF control Г i , whereas the phase shift between the driving frequencies, θ, is varied to adjust .We focus on the effect of changing the control parameter for on the electron heating and ionization dynamics and on Г i . We find that in both types of dual-frequency strongly electronegative discharges, changing the control parameter results in a complex effect on the electron heating and ionization dynamics: in classical dual-frequency discharges, besides the frequency coupling affecting the sheath expansion heating, additional frequency coupling mechanisms influence the electron heating in the plasma bulk and at the collapsing sheath edge; in EA dual-frequency discharges the electron heating in the bulk results in asymmetric ionization dynamics for values of θ around 45°, i.e., in the case of a symmetric applied voltage waveform, that affects the dc self-bias generation.
“…In this Ω-mode [27], a high electric field builds up in the bulk region due to the low electrical conductivity caused by the high electron-neutral collision frequency -this drift field accelerates electrons to high energies to create ionization in the bulk. Similar electron heating and ionization dynamics in the bulk region have been found in dusty plasmas [28][29][30] as well as in discharges operated in various electronegative gases [7,8,[15][16][17][18][19][31][32][33][34][35]. While in case of dust contaminated plasmas the origin of the low electrical conductivity (and that of the high electric field) in the bulk is the loss of charged particles the dust particles, in electronegative plasmas the depleted electron density is due to electron attachment in the discharge center.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…CF 4 discharges exhibit a complex chemistry and become strongly electronegative under typical operating conditions. Under these conditions the plasma composition, the electron heating and ionization dynamics, and the discharge operation differ significantly from those of electropositive discharges [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Two types of capacitive dual-frequency discharges, used in plasma processing applications to achieve the separate control of the ion flux, Г i , and the mean ion energy, , at the electrodes, operated in CF 4 , are investigated by particle-in-cell simulations: (i) In classical dual-frequency discharges, driven by significantly different frequencies (1.937 MHz + 27.12 MHz), and Г i are controlled by the voltage amplitudes of the low-frequency and high-frequeny components, Φ LF and Φ HF , respectively.(ii) In electrically asymmetric (EA) discharges, operated at a fundamental frequency and its second harmonic (13.56 MHz + 27.12 MHz), Φ LF and Φ HF control Г i , whereas the phase shift between the driving frequencies, θ, is varied to adjust .We focus on the effect of changing the control parameter for on the electron heating and ionization dynamics and on Г i . We find that in both types of dual-frequency strongly electronegative discharges, changing the control parameter results in a complex effect on the electron heating and ionization dynamics: in classical dual-frequency discharges, besides the frequency coupling affecting the sheath expansion heating, additional frequency coupling mechanisms influence the electron heating in the plasma bulk and at the collapsing sheath edge; in EA dual-frequency discharges the electron heating in the bulk results in asymmetric ionization dynamics for values of θ around 45°, i.e., in the case of a symmetric applied voltage waveform, that affects the dc self-bias generation.
“…This can be explained by the different dominant electron power absorption mechanisms in Ar and CF 4 . In Ar, electrons gain energy during the rf cycle predominantly by reflection from the expanding sheaths, whereas in CF 4 , electrons gain energy predominantly by the drift-ambipolar mechanism under many conditions, as described by Schulze et al 25,43 This can be observed in the bottom row of Fig. 4.…”
Section: A Amplitude Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…22 Reducing the gas pressure increases the mean free path for energetic electrons, and this leads to changes to the spatial profiles of excitation and ionization. In addition, Schulze et al 43 demonstrated that the impact of the DA heating decreases at lower pressure, which could also affect the discharge asymmetry. Figure 10 shows the DC self-bias voltage, experimentally measured, and obtained from the PIC simulations, as a function of pressure p, for sawtooth-up and sawtooth-down waveforms, for In all cases, the DC self-bias voltage increases with pressure, similar to argon.…”
We report investigations of capacitively coupled carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) plasmas excited with tailored voltage waveforms containing up to five harmonics of a base frequency of 5.5 MHz. The impact of both the slope asymmetry, and the amplitude asymmetry, of these waveforms on the discharge is examined by combining experiments with particle-in-cell simulations. For all conditions studied herein, the discharge is shown to operate in the drift-ambipolar mode, where a comparatively large electric field in the plasma bulk (outside the sheaths) is the main mechanism for electron power absorption leading to ionization. We show that both types of waveform asymmetries strongly influence the ion energy at the electrodes, with the particularity of having the highest ion flux on the electrode where the lowest ion energy is observed. Even at the comparatively high pressure (600 mTorr) and low fundamental frequency of 5.5 MHz used here, tailoring the voltage waveforms is shown to efficiently create an asymmetry of both the ion energy and the ion flux in geometrically symmetric reactors
“…Their main constituents are typically positive and negative ions, and electrons are only present as a minor species. Such a composition leads to unique effects, e.g., the dominant mechanism of electron energy gain is typically due to the ambipolar and drift electric fields within the ion-ion plasma bulk [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], in sharp contrast with the mechanisms in (more common) electropositive (electron-ion) plasmas where the dynamics of the boundary sheaths conveys energy to the electrons.Being complex dynamical systems, plasmas are susceptible to various instabilities. Strong modulations of the plasma density and light emission -termed as "striations" -have extensively been studied in electropositive DC discharges [19][20][21][22], wherein ion-acoustic or ionization waves form the basics of these features.…”
Self-organized spatial structures in the light emission from the ion-ion capacitive RF plasma of a strongly electronegative gas (CF4) are observed experimentally for the first time. Their formation is analyzed and understood based on particle-based kinetic simulations. These "striations" are found to be generated by the resonance between the driving radio-frequency and the eigenfrequency of the ion-ion plasma (derived from an analytical model) that establishes a modulation of the electric field, the ion densities, as well as the energy gain and loss processes of electrons in the plasma. The growth of the instability is followed by the numerical simulations.Plasmas in electronegative gases exhibit complex physical and chemical kinetics [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Their main constituents are typically positive and negative ions, and electrons are only present as a minor species. Such a composition leads to unique effects, e.g., the dominant mechanism of electron energy gain is typically due to the ambipolar and drift electric fields within the ion-ion plasma bulk [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], in sharp contrast with the mechanisms in (more common) electropositive (electron-ion) plasmas where the dynamics of the boundary sheaths conveys energy to the electrons.Being complex dynamical systems, plasmas are susceptible to various instabilities. Strong modulations of the plasma density and light emission -termed as "striations" -have extensively been studied in electropositive DC discharges [19][20][21][22], wherein ion-acoustic or ionization waves form the basics of these features. Striations also occur in electropositive inductively coupled plasmas [23], plasma display panels [24], and in plasma clouds in the ionosphere [25,26]. In these system the appearance of striations is explained by theories based on the electron kinetics. Little is known, however, about the nature of striations in electronegative plasmas where the ion kinetics may play the dominant role: observations have been limited to DC plasmas [27,28], and striations have never been observed in electronegative capacitively-coupled RF (CCRF) plasmas, to our best knowledge. Here we report the observation of striations, that form in the bulk of electronegative CCRF plasmas. The experimental observations are compared with simulation data, which allow a detailed investigation of the underlying physics.In the experiment (described in detail in [18]) the plasma is produced in CF 4 between two parallel electrodes made of stainless steel with a diameter of 10 cm. The gap between the electrodes is L=1.5 cm. The bottom electrode and the chamber walls are grounded. A sinusoidal voltage of a function generator is amplified and applied to the top electrode via a matching network. The generator is also connected to a pulse delay generator that triggers in a synchronized manner an intensified charge-coupled device (ICCD) camera for Phase Resolved Optical Emission Spectroscopy (PROES) measurements. The ICCD camera is equipped with an objective lens and an interfer...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.