Ionising Radiation Exposure to Orthopaedic Trainees: The Effect of Sub-Specialty Training

Abstract

INTRODUCTION We monitored image intensifier use by orthopaedic trainees to assess their exposure to ionising radiation and to investigate the influence of sub-specialty training.MATERIALS AND METHODS Five different orthopaedic registrars recorded their monthly image intensifier screening times and exposure doses for all cases (trauma and elective), for a combined total of 12 non-consecutive months. Radiation exposure was monitored using shoulder and waist film badges worn both by surgeons and radiographers screening their cases.RESULTS Registrars in spinal sub-specialties were exposed to significantly higher doses per case and cumulative doses per month than non-spinal trainees (P < 0.05), but significantly lower screening times per case (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in cumulative screening times per month (P > 0.05). Regression analysis for all surgeons showed a significant relationship between shoulder film badge reading and cumulative dose exposed per month (P < 0.05), but not for cumulative screening time. Shoulder film badge recordings were significantly higher for spinal compared with non-spinal registrars (P < 0.05), although all badges were below the level for radiation reporting. Only one radiographer badge recorded a dose above threshold.CONCLUSIONS Whilst the long-term effects of sub-reporting doses of radiation are not fully understood, we consider that this study demonstrates that trainees should not be complacent in accepting inadequate radiation protection. The higher doses encountered with spinal imaging means that sub-specialty trainees should be alerted to the risk of their increased exposure. The principle of minimising radiation exposure must be maintained by all trainees at all times.

The Great Unknown—A systematic literature review about risk associated with intraoperative imaging during orthopaedic surgeries

“…In the next step, only studies where effective radiation to the surgeon was directly measured in the operating theatre were further considered for this review. Studies using indirect measurements or formulas to back calculate surgeon exposure [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] as well as studies measuring radiation exposure in Gray only were not further reviewed because of the problem of comparability [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”

Occupational Radiation Exposure from C Arm Fluoroscopy During Common Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures and its Prevention

“…Effort should be to supplement image to the clinical knowledge and not vice versa [2]. Some studies have reported that more the experience lesser is the exposure [13,18].…”

Emission of radiation in the orthopaedic operation room: A comprehensive review

“…This is very difficult to implement in an in vivo study. For this reason, the radiation doses are typically measured with thermoluminescense dosimeters (TLDs) [9][10][11][12] . Hereby, the radiation is converted to light and consecutively measured.…”

“…In spine surgery, different studies showed a high exposure to radiation performing dorsal stabilisations on the spine 10 . The position of the radiation source is really important to reduce the scatter radiation as much as possible.…”