2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic shortcut currents via manifolds in reverse electrodialysis stacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, limiting the curves at 29 A m −2 , the GPD that can be delivered by a five-triplet module is even higher than that delivered by a 38-triplet module (6.5 ± 0.2 W m −2 and 4.5 ± 0.1 W m −2 , respectively). At (extrapolated) higher current densities, Figure 3b, a smaller difference can be observed under maximum GPD conditions, suggesting that the effects of the number of triplets depend on the applied current and, in particular, decrease as the current increases [61]. Anyway, the 38-triplet stack would cover a much larger range of current density, exhibiting the extrapolated maximum GPD at 150 A m −2 against the~100 A m −2 of the five-triplet stack, likely due a lower apparent resistance of the triplet associated to parasitic currents and/or to be the smaller relative effect of the blank resistance.…”
Section: Effect Of Acid and Base Concentration And Of Number Of Tripletsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, limiting the curves at 29 A m −2 , the GPD that can be delivered by a five-triplet module is even higher than that delivered by a 38-triplet module (6.5 ± 0.2 W m −2 and 4.5 ± 0.1 W m −2 , respectively). At (extrapolated) higher current densities, Figure 3b, a smaller difference can be observed under maximum GPD conditions, suggesting that the effects of the number of triplets depend on the applied current and, in particular, decrease as the current increases [61]. Anyway, the 38-triplet stack would cover a much larger range of current density, exhibiting the extrapolated maximum GPD at 150 A m −2 against the~100 A m −2 of the five-triplet stack, likely due a lower apparent resistance of the triplet associated to parasitic currents and/or to be the smaller relative effect of the blank resistance.…”
Section: Effect Of Acid and Base Concentration And Of Number Of Tripletsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The performance of ED processes is governed by membrane selectivity and transport properties, non-Ohmic voltage drop given by the membrane potential ("back" electromotive force in most cases, electromotive force in RED), Ohmic voltage drop, and pumping power consumption. The voltage drop over the stack can be computed as [16,145,146]:…”
Section: Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total η for ion mixtures is the sum over all anions or cations. The current efficiency is less than 100% because of unwanted salt and water transport phenomena, water splitting, and current leakage (parasitic or shunt currents through manifolds [146]) [8]. Further performance parameters such as removal efficiency, concentration factor and water recovery, result from easy calculations.…”
Section: Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xia et al investigated the ABFB on both single-cell [ 30 ] and stack (5–20 cell units) level [ 31 ], and concluded that the single cell performance can be extrapolated to the stack performance. However, additional energy losses by parasitic currents (also known as shortcut currents [ 32 ], shunt currents [ 31 , 33 ], or leakage currents [ 34 ]) through the manifolds need to be taken into account in the stack [ 31 ]. This aspect was highlighted by Culcasi et al, who modeled ABFB systems predicting a loss in round-trip efficiency in the range of 25–35% due to parasitic currents [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%