1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00212503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-selective electrode measurements of copper(II) activity in contaminated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second study was undertaken using only lettuce with five new soils, but expanding the chemical analyses by exploring the effectiveness of a variety of conventional extractants as well as chelator-bound anion exchange membranes (AEM) (Tambasco 1998). The soil characterization was complemented with electrochemical speciation of free metal species in the soil solutions (Sauvé et al 1995;). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second study was undertaken using only lettuce with five new soils, but expanding the chemical analyses by exploring the effectiveness of a variety of conventional extractants as well as chelator-bound anion exchange membranes (AEM) (Tambasco 1998). The soil characterization was complemented with electrochemical speciation of free metal species in the soil solutions (Sauvé et al 1995;). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, is slight, 31 and although the Cu ISE is sensitive to both Cu + and Cu 2+ ions, the Cu + activity under aerobic conditions is a number of log units lower than that of Cu 2+ ions (Visual MINTEQ). In the present study, the test soils were regularly aerated and mixed to reduce the occurrence of anaerobic sites.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different calibration schemes and regressions could be realised with different Cu buffers but the end result is identical. [22,24] Equilibration of the buffer solutions Fig. 2 reports the evolution of the potential of the ISE as a function of pH for two buffer solutions of different initial pH.…”
Section: Electrode Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most often used are pH potentiometry, [6] cation-exchange resins, [7][8][9] charge separation (Donnan membrane), [10,11] anodic stripping voltammetry, [7,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] diffusive gradients in thin films measurements [18] and cupric ion-selective electrodes (ISE). [3,14,15,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] All these techniques have some advantages and disadvantages and none can be considered universal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%