2004
DOI: 10.5194/acp-4-1933-2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion production rate in a boreal forest based on ion, particle and radiation measurements

Abstract: Abstract. In this study the ion production rates in a boreal forest were studied based on two different methods: 1) cluster ion and particle concentration measurements, 2) external radiation and radon concentration measurements. Both methods produced reasonable estimates for ion production rates. The average ion production rate calculated from aerosol particle size distribution and air ion mobility distribution measurements was 2.6 ion pairs cm −3 s −1 , and based on external radiation and radon measurements, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
125
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
125
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the relative humidity at our site is very low during the particle formation and growth period (on average, 37 %), and the hygroscopic growth factors of the particles not known, CS was calculated for dry particle sizes. The hygroscopic growth of ambient aerosol particles is usually quite moderate at relative humidities below 50 % (Zhou, 2001;Laakso et al, 2004;Birmili et al, 2009;Wiedensohler et al, 2012) so our assumption of a dry particle radius should not cause a major error in calculating the value of CS.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methods Used On Measurement Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the relative humidity at our site is very low during the particle formation and growth period (on average, 37 %), and the hygroscopic growth factors of the particles not known, CS was calculated for dry particle sizes. The hygroscopic growth of ambient aerosol particles is usually quite moderate at relative humidities below 50 % (Zhou, 2001;Laakso et al, 2004;Birmili et al, 2009;Wiedensohler et al, 2012) so our assumption of a dry particle radius should not cause a major error in calculating the value of CS.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methods Used On Measurement Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the planetary boundary layer, the nucleation of H 2 SO 4 and an organic compound can be considered using either the cluster activation scheme of Kulmala et al (2006) and Riipinen et al (2007), or the kinetic nucleation scheme of Laakso et al (2004) and Kuang et al (2008) implementation these processes (when switched on) are limited to forested areas. Sensitivity experiments are performed with both schemes (HAM2 cluster and HAM2 kinetic in Table 4).…”
Section: Boundary Layer Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For calculating the CS the dry size distribution measured with DMPS was converted into the ambient distribution using the parameterization by Laakso et al (2004). The transition regime correction factor for mass transfer β m was calculated with the expression by Fuchs and Sutugin (1970) using a value of 1 for mass accommodation coefficient.…”
Section: Concentrations ([Mt] [Oh] and [O 3 ]) Withmentioning
confidence: 99%