1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-pairs in proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
411
4
9

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 672 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
15
411
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Salt bridges within these geometric ranges are generally stronger interactions than hydrogen bonds. Our identification of such salt bridges follows previous studies [11][12][13] by extending the maximum distance between donor and acceptor to 4.6Å and including all such salt bridges as constraints.…”
Section: Statics Modeling the Forces Within Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Salt bridges within these geometric ranges are generally stronger interactions than hydrogen bonds. Our identification of such salt bridges follows previous studies [11][12][13] by extending the maximum distance between donor and acceptor to 4.6Å and including all such salt bridges as constraints.…”
Section: Statics Modeling the Forces Within Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Because the amount of nonpolar surface area calculated in RdPf to be buried upon folding is similar to other proteins of comparable size, AC, associated with hydrophobic effects should also be similar (Livingston et al, 1991). Furthermore, the observation that only approximately two intramolecular salt bridges are present in the different rubredoxins (about that expected for a typical protein the size of rubredoxin) (Barlow & Thornton, 1983) indicates that exposure of charged groups during unfolding will not make a significant contribution to AC,.…”
Section: Acmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We defined SDS to be in contact with an amino acid if any of SDS atoms were within 4 Å of any amino acid atom, because this distance entails for hydrophobic interactions of the SDS tails as well as salt bridge interactions to the sulphate head-group. 28 This was calculated for every snapshot collected for each of the 12 simulations and the results averaged. From Figure 8 it is evident that SDS is in contact with the two loops (amino acids 64-75 and 160-176) situated on either side of the catalytic triad.…”
Section: Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native HiC was inhibited with diethyl-p-nitrophenyl-phosphate (DNPP: purchased from Sigma) with the aim of preparing a complex with DEP by methods previously established for the Humicola lanuginosa 28,46 and Rhizomucor miehei 47 lipases. The enzyme was washed and concentrated to 30 mg mL 21 and subjected to crystallization screening.…”
Section: Crystallization and X-ray Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation